Ongoing ECHO Research Investigates the Effects of Preterm Birth and Environmental Exposures on Child Health Outcomes

A recent review paper authored by Michael O’Shea, MD of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Monica McGrath, PhD of Johns Hopkins University, and Judy Aschner, MD of Hackensack University, and Barry Lester, PhD of Brown University’s Alpert Medical School provides an overview of the collaborative work ECHO has been doing to study and collect data on the effects of premature birth on child health outcomes. The article describes ECHO cohorts that have enrolled premature infants (born before 32 weeks of gestation) between April 2002 and March 2020, including three ECHO cohorts that are almost exclusively comprised of preterm infants. Researchers can use ECHO data to investigate the relationship between preterm birth, environmental exposures, and childhood chronic and developmental health conditions. This research, titled “Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes: Cohorts of Individuals Born Very Preterm,” is published in Pediatric Research.

The ECHO Cohorts included in this review recruited almost 1,800 preterm infants from 14 states. ECHO researchers are collecting extensive data from these preterm infants, including data on learning and intellectual impairments, asthma, obesity, sleep health, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers can use this data to address questions about 1) the effect of preterm birth on a child’s risk for chronic and developmental health conditions; 2) socioeconomic disparities in child health outcomes; and 3) the relationship between early life exposures and health outcomes later in life among individuals born preterm.

“Our goal is for this review article to serve as a ‘roadmap’ to aid child health researchers in their efforts to apply data from the ECHO preterm cohorts toward the broad goals of the ECHO program,” said Dr. O’Shea. “This resource provides researchers with many opportunities to improve their understanding of modifiable risk factors and mechanisms leading to chronic illness in children, pointing the way towards interventions that can optimize the well-being of children in the United States.”

Researchers not affiliated with the ECHO Program will be able to obtain de-identified data from very preterm children in the ECHO-wide Cohort, along with data from around 30,000 children born at term through a controlled-access public use database. This data will include information about a broad range of environmental exposures and outcomes related to chronic illness among children in the United States. Using this data, researchers can continue to build off of ECHO’s mission to enhance the health of children through research that may help inform healthcare practices, programs, and policies.

Read the research summary.

ECHO Researchers Investigate Effects of Preterm Birth, Environmental Exposures on Child Health

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Researchers Investigate Effects of Preterm Birth, Environmental Exposures on Child Health

Authors: Michael O’Shea, Monica McGrath, Judy Aschner, Barry Lester, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

ECHO researchers are collecting extensive data from very preterm infants, including data on learning and intellectual impairments, asthma, obesity, sleep health, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article provides an overview of how data from ECHO cohorts are being used to address questions about the combined effects of preterm birth and environmental exposures on child health outcomes.

 

What was the study's impact?

Researchers can use the information in this review to enhance their knowledge of the ECHO Program’s resources to study preterm infants. Researchers can use ECHO data to investigate the relationship between preterm birth, environmental exposures, and childhood risk of chronic and developmental health conditions.

 

Why was this study needed?

Infants who are born premature (before 32 weeks of pregnancy) are at a high risk for multiple health disorders. This review paper outlines resources available within the ECHO Program for researchers seeking to study the effects of preterm birth and environmental exposures on child health outcomes.

 

Who was involved?

This review article includes ECHO cohorts that enrolled infants who were born premature. These cohorts enrolled almost 1,800 preterm infants across 14 states that were born between April 2002 and March 2020, including three ECHO cohorts that are almost exclusively comprised of preterm infants.

 

What happened during the study?

A team of experts reviewed the characteristics of the ECHO cohorts that are collecting data on preterm infants. Through this review, they sought to describe the research goals, participant selection criteria, key environmental exposures, and child health outcomes of each cohort.

 

What happens next?

ECHO researchers will continue to investigate early life factors and environmental exposures that may affect children’s health outcomes later in life. Researchers not participating in the ECHO Program will be able to obtain de-identified data from preterm children in the ECHO-wide Cohort, along with data from around 30,000 children born at term through a controlled-access public use database. This data will include information about a broad range of environmental exposures and outcomes related to chronic illness among children in the United States. Using this data, researchers can continue to build off of ECHO’s mission to enhance the health of children for generations to come.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes: Cohorts of Individuals Born Very Preterm,” in Pediatric Research.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published August 10, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Exposures and Pregnancy

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, et al.

How Chemical Exposures in Pregnancy Affect Gene Changes in the Placenta

Author(s): Alison Paquette, Sheela Sathyanarayana, MD, MPH, et al.

How Environmental Exposures Affect Child Health Across Multiple Generations

Author(s): Carrie Breton, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

ECHO researchers study the effects of neighborhood environmental and social conditions on pregnancy and infant health

Collaborative ECHO research led by Sheena Martenies, PhD, MPH of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign investigates the combined effects of environmental hazards and social stressors on pregnancy and infant health. This research included information on more than 13,000 infants born between 2010 and 2019 from 41 ECHO cohorts located throughout the United States. In this study, researchers found that pregnant women living in neighborhoods with higher combined exposures had shorter pregnancies and smaller babies. This research, titled “Associations between combined exposure to environmental hazards and social stressors at the neighborhood level and individual perinatal outcomes in the ECHO-wide cohort,” is published in Health & Place.

Previous studies have found that neighborhood conditions can influence pregnancy and infant health, but few have examined the effects of exposure to a combination of environmental and social conditions. It is important to look at multiple exposures simultaneously because this more closely mirrors real-world experiences. There are existing tools for looking at combined exposures to environmental hazards and social stressors in neighborhoods, but they either do not have national coverage or they do not cover the time frames needed.

ECHO researchers developed an exposure index which combined data on multiple environmental hazards and social circumstances—including air pollutants, vehicle traffic, poverty, and crowded housing—into a single measure of neighborhood conditions. Pregnant participants were assigned an index score based on where they lived during their pregnancy. Then, the researchers looked at how this index score was associated with birthweight, length of pregnancy, and other pregnancy outcomes.

The researchers found that pregnant women living in neighborhoods with higher combined exposures had shorter pregnancies and smaller babies. For Black pregnant participants, there was a higher risk of preterm birth associated with increased combined exposures during pregnancy compared to White pregnant participants. The researchers also found that pregnant participants living in rural areas had shorter pregnancies and smaller babies compared to pregnant participants living in urban areas who had similar index scores.

More research is needed to determine which factors included in the exposure index are most important in pregnancy and child health outcomes. Some members of the research team are currently studying data from two ECHO cohorts (Healthy Start and MADRES) to explore how neighborhood-level exposures might interact to influence obesity later in life.

Read the research summary.

ECHO Study Suggests Air Pollution, Secondhand Smoke, Formaldehyde Exposure Affect Length of Time to Get Pregnant

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Suggests Air Pollution, Secondhand Smoke, Formaldehyde Exposure Affect Length of Time to Get Pregnant

Author(s): Eva Siegel, Linda Kahn, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, the Office of the Director, the National Institutes of Health, with co-funding from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR).

 

What were the study results?

The strongest evidence points to an association between exposures to traffic-related air pollution, secondhand smoke, and a chemical called formaldehyde—a common workplace exposure in construction sites and nail salons—and longer time to pregnancy. Specifically, exposure to particulate matter and nitrogen oxide gases lowered couples’ chances of becoming pregnant. Traffic and the burning of other types of materials besides gas and diesel create particulate matter and nitrogen oxide gases. Volatile organic compounds, which are used in manufacturing processes, did not appear to affect time to pregnancy.

 

What was the study's impact?

This review suggests that certain chemicals in the air may lengthen the time it takes for couples to become pregnant. More research is needed to better understand how these chemicals affect reproductive health. To collect this information, future studies can provide participants with personal air monitors that can let researchers know about the quality of air participants are actually breathing instead of relying on imprecise data from outdoor monitors or participant recall.

The research team also pointed out that there are remaining questions about whether the air people breathe around the time of conception is what matters most or whether there are certain life stages, such as puberty, when being exposed to air pollution may be especially damaging. The ECHO-wide Cohort, which allows researchers to access information from a large and diverse population, can serve as an important resource for answering these questions.

 

Why was this study needed?

Previous studies have looked at how air pollution may affect how long it takes to become pregnant. Time to pregnancy is a measure used to estimate a couple’s ability to conceive and is commonly used to diagnose infertility. In this paper, the authors review past studies on air pollution to identify types of air pollutants—including pollution from traffic, chemicals in the workplace, and secondhand smoke—that might affect how long it takes to get pregnant.

 

Who was involved?

This review includes all papers published in English on this topic from January 1, 1990 to February 11, 2021. The analysis covered 33 articles, of which eight looked at outdoor air quality, six looked at secondhand smoke exposure, and 19 looked at air quality in the workplace.

 

What happened during the study?

The research team searched six leading science libraries and identified 33 human studies related to exposure to outdoor and indoor air pollutants and time to pregnancy. The team read each article, assigned it a score based on the quality of the study design, and created summary tables containing the most important findings of each study. They then compared the consistency of results between studies, especially among high-quality papers, about whether certain types of air pollution affected time to pregnancy.

 

What happens next?

This is the third review this team of authors has written on chemicals and time to pregnancy. Individual authors will continue to fill in the research gaps previously mentioned, including conducting studies where women will be wearing personal air monitors.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Indoor and outdoor air pollution and couple fecundability: a systematic review” in Human Reproduction Update.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

 

Read the associated article.

Published July 27, 2022

Read More Airways Research Summaries

Review of Prenatal Air Pollution Exposure and Brain Development

Author(s): Heather E. Volk, et al.

Which Children Develop Asthma in the US

Author(s): Christine Cole Johnson and Aruna Chandran

Update on Vitamin E and Its Potential Role in Preventing or Treating Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Author(s): Cosby Stone, Cynthia McEvoy, Judy Aschner, et al

NIH Program Study Suggests Racial/Ethnic Sleep Disparities During Pregnancy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Maristella Lucchini, PhD

Pregnant Black women may sleep less and wake up more often than pregnant White women, according to a new study funded by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Poor sleep during pregnancy is common, and it’s associated with poor outcomes in late pregnancy and after birth. Although minority groups in the United States often experience worse sleep than non-Hispanic White people, sleep disparities during pregnancy are understudied. Better understanding maternal sleep disparities—and what causes them—can help improve health outcomes for pregnant women and their children.

“Research shows poor sleep contributes to adverse maternal outcomes that disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority communities,” said Maristella Lucchini, PhD, of Columbia University Irving Medical Center. “We wanted to know if sleep was a factor that contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in overall maternal health.”

Dr. Lucchini, an ECHO Program investigator, led this collaborative research effort, which is now published in Sleep.

The research team analyzed data from 2,500 pregnant participants in 14 ECHO cohorts nationwide. They found that compared to non-Hispanic white participants:

Non-Hispanic black participants reported:

    • Shorter sleep duration
    • More sleep disturbances
    • Similar sleep quality

Hispanic participants reported:

    • Longer sleep duration
    • Better sleep quality
    • Fewer sleep disturbances

Lucchini, M. et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in subjective sleep duration, sleep quality, and sleep disturbances during pregnancy: an ECHO study. Sleep. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac075

###

About ECHO: ECHO is a nationwide research program supported by the NIH. Launched in 2016, ECHO aims to enhance the health of children for generations to come. ECHO investigators study the effects of a broad range of early environmental influences on child health and development. For more information, visit echochildren.org.

About the NIH: NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information, visit www.nih.gov.

Media Contacts

For information or to request an interview, contact Rebekah Yeager,  rebekah.yeager@nih.gov.

If you are not a member of the media, but have a general inquiry, please contact  NIHKidsandEnvironment@od.nih.gov.

Connect With Us

echo connectorCheck out the recent issues of our bi-monthly newsletter, the ECHO Connector, for program news and the latest research findings.

To receive the ECHO Connector through email, subscribe here.

Follow @ECHOChildHealth for the latest ECHO Program updates on Twitter.

ECHO Researchers Report Higher Levels of Oxidative Stress among Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Pregnant Women

A collaborative research effort led by Stephanie Eick, PhD, MPH of Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health and Rachel Morello-Frosch PhD, MPH of the University of California, Berkeley investigated the relationship between various biological, behavioral, and social factors and higher levels of oxidative stress in pregnant women, which is often associated with poor prenatal health outcomes. Pregnant participants who were 30+ years old and had a college degree had lower levels of oxidative stress. In contrast, levels of oxidative stress were higher among pregnant participants who were overweight or obese, or unmarried. Levels of oxidative stress biomarkers were also higher among pregnant participants who were current smokers or had less than a high school education.

This research, titled “Associations between social, biologic, and behavioral factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress during pregnancy: Findings from four ECHO cohorts,” is published in Science of the Total Environment.

To measure oxidative stress, the researchers collected urine samples from approximately 2,000 pregnant participants in the mainland United States and Puerto Rico who were enrolled in one of four ECHO cohorts. They measured the levels of oxidative stress biomarkers at up to three time points during pregnancy and calculated the association between biomarker levels and biological, behavioral, and social factors. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, marital/partnered status, parity, and smoking status were included as biological and behavioral factors while race/ethnicity, maternal education, and stressful life events were considered social factors.

“This is the largest study to date to examine the relationship between biologic, social, and behavioral factors and oxidative stress during pregnancy,” said Dr. Eick. “Our results provide important clues into how social and economic inequalities lead to poor health in pregnant women.” This study may also inform future studies looking at risk factors for preterm birth.

As for ongoing research, the team is examining the impact of oxidative stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth.

Read the Research Summary.

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

<< Back to Research Summaries

Study Shows Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Authors: Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Most of the chemicals were found in at least one of the women in the study and about a third of the chemicals were found in greater than half of the participants. One fifth of the chemicals were detected in over 90% of the pregnant women indicating widespread exposure to the chemicals measured.

The study found some chemicals were detected more often or were present in higher amounts in non-white women, those with lower education, those who were single, and those exposed to tobacco. Hispanic women had higher levels of some chemicals not included in previous biomonitoring studies including parabens (preservatives) as well as phthalates and bisphenols (from plastics).

The study found that levels of some of the chemicals used as replacements for more toxic ones that were banned or phased out, increased over time and were present in higher amounts than have been seen in previous studies. The levels of several phased out chemicals were found to remain stable or decrease over time.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This is the largest study to date to measure exposure to a wide variety of environmental chemicals in a diverse group of pregnant women across the U.S. The results of this study highlight the widespread and unequal exposure of pregnant women to chemicals from air pollution, food, water, plastics, and other industrial and consumer products.

 

Why was this study needed?

There is little data on exposure of pregnant women to many pesticides and industrial chemicals, even those that could be harmful during pregnancy and throughout childhood development.

 

Who was involved?

The study included 171 women from five U.S. states and Puerto Rico who were part of an ECHO cohort. Of these women, 60% were Black or Hispanic.

 

What happened during the study?

Research team members measured 89 biomarkers for more than 100 chemicals in urine samples from pregnant women in nine ECHO cohorts. Most of the chemicals can be found in pesticides, plastics, sunscreens, personal care products, and flame retardants. Many of the chemicals measured are replacement chemicals: chemicals meant to replace other harmful chemicals (e.g., BPA, phthalates). The team used a new method that measured multiple chemicals in a single urine sample to determine if pregnant women were exposed to the chemicals. The researchers then studied how different factors—such as age, race, education level, and the year the sample was collected—related to the levels of chemicals found.

 

What happens next?

The research team will continue to study exposures in a larger, diverse population of pregnant women (more than 6,500) to see whether these prenatal chemical exposures are linked to negative birth outcomes. This data will be important for understanding the factors that may contribute to additional negative health effects during pregnancy and childhood.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article titled, “Exposure to contemporary and emerging chemicals in commerce among pregnant women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program” in Environment Science & Technology.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published May 10, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Chemical Exposures and Pregnancy

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

ECHO Study Identifies Biological, Behavioral, and Social Factors Affecting Pregnancy Health

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Identifies Biological, Behavioral, and Social Factors Affecting Pregnancy Health

Authors: Stephanie Eick, Rachel Morello-Frosch, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Pregnant participants who were over 30 years old and had a college degree had lower levels of oxidative stress. Levels of oxidative stress were higher among pregnant participants who were overweight or obese and unmarried. Also, current smokers or those with less than a high school education had higher levels of a oxidative stress biomarker. These results help identify how social, biologic, and behavioral factors may contribute to poor health in mothers and children.

 

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This is the largest study to date looking at the relationship between biological, social, and behavioral factors and oxidative stress during pregnancy. The results of this study provide important clues into how socioeconomic inequalities can contribute to poor health in pregnant women. This study may also inform future studies looking at risk factors for preterm birth.

 

Why was this study needed?

There is little data on what can cause oxidative stress during pregnancy. Oxidative stress is a process that can trigger cell damage and it is thought to play a role in the development of some diseases. By identifying biological, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors in a mother’s day-to-day life that may lead to increased risk for oxidative stress, research can help inform the development of targeted strategies for the prevention of poor prenatal health outcomes.

 

Who was involved?

This study involved approximately 2,000 pregnant participants in the mainland United States and Puerto Rico who were enrolled in one of four ECHO cohorts.

 

What happened during the study?

Researchers collected urine samples from participants and measured the levels of biomarkers for oxidative stress. Researchers calculated how levels of oxidative stress biomarkers changed in response to biological, behavioral, and social factors. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, marital/partnered status, parity, and smoking status were included as biological and behavioral factors while race/ethnicity, maternal education, and stressful life events were considered social factors.

 

What happens next?

The research team is examining the impact of oxidative stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth.

 

Where can I learn more?

The full journal article, titled “Associations between social, biologic, and behavioral factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress during pregnancy: Findings from four ECHO cohorts” is published in Science of the Total Environment.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published April 29, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Author(s): Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

Informed Mothers More Likely to Engage in Collective Action, Reduce Family- and Community-Level Chemical Exposures

<< Back to Research Summaries

Informed Mothers More Likely to Engage in Collective Action, Reduce Family- and Community-Level Chemical Exposures

Authors: Amy Padula, Rachel Morello-Frosch, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, the Office of the Director, and the National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

This study found that participants knew about the dangers of chemical exposures and were motivated to act to protect the health of their families and communities, although they have busy family lives, and the pandemic has further prevented them from participating in collective action. Participants requested strategies that were time-efficient and included straightforward, accessible information on how to reduce exposures at the personal and community level.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

Researchers have an opportunity to directly learn from participants about how to improve the way in which chemical exposure results are reported in future studies. Report-back systems, or ways that study results are returned to participants, can present valuable information for participants about environmental health and how to lower chemical exposures in their homes and communities, and hold policy makers responsible for protecting parents and children from harmful chemical exposures. Researchers can use tools like the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI) to give their participants access to individualized chemical results with information about how to take individual and collective action to reduce exposures.

 

Why was this study needed?

Participants in chemical exposure studies who receive reports on their personal exposures often look for information to reduce those exposures. Many chemical exposures are the result of policies, regulations, and practices, not individual behaviors and lifestyles. Individuals can address those policies and regulations through collective action, which is working with others to reach a common goal. Researchers wanted to understand the role of personal exposure reports in a participant’s interest in engagement in collective action.

 

Who was involved?

In summer 2020, the researchers held three online focus groups in English and Spanish with a diverse group of 18 participants from pregnancy cohorts in Illinois and California.

 

What happened during the study?

This study aimed to understand how much participants know about sources of potentially harmful chemical exposures and their experience and interest in participating in collective action. Focus group participants talked about some of the barriers and strategies to participating in collective action, and their preferences for receiving and using their personalized reports about environmental chemical exposures. Input from these focus groups can be used to help design tools and content to report results of exposure research to ECHO participants.

 

What happens next?

The researchers are currently studying participant surveys from before and after participants received their chemical exposure reports to learn more about how participants use DERBI. These surveys may also reveal how DERBI reports may influence participant efforts to reduce exposure in their homes and communities through collective action.

 

Where can I learn more?

More information about the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI) can be found on the Silent Spring Institute website.

Access the full journal article, titled “Perspectives of peripartum people on opportunities for personal and collective action to reduce exposure to everyday chemicals: Focus groups to inform exposure report-back” in Environmental Research.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published March 26, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Chemical Exposures and Pregnancy

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Author(s): Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

ECHO Study Suggests Antimony Exposure During Pregnancy Contributes to Lower Birth Weight

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Suggests Antimony Exposure During Pregnancy Contributes to Lower Birth Weight

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Researchers found that combined exposure to all metals in the mixture did not affect birth weight.  Mothers with high levels of the metal antimony in their urine had smaller babies across all three of the ECHO cohorts. Two other metals – cadmium and molybdenum – had no impact on fetal growth. Findings for other metals (cobalt, mercury, nickel, tin) varied depending on the study population and whether the baby was male or female.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This study used an approach that looked at multiple chemicals at once, in contrast to previous studies that have typically evaluated one chemical at a time. The findings suggest that antimony, an understudied metalloid, may harm fetal growth in different populations across the United States.

 

Why was this study needed?

Exposure to toxic metals can harm fetal growth (how much a baby grows during pregnancy), while nutritionally essential metals can support fetal growth. Previous research studying the effects of metals during pregnancy on fetal growth has usually focused on one metal at a time. However, most people are exposed to multiple metals, which may have complex effects on fetal growth. Therefore, combining data from three ECHO cohorts representing different geographic regions in the U.S., the research team looked at how maternal exposure to multiple metals affects fetal growth, an important indicator of future health.

 

Who was involved?

This study included approximately 1,000 pairs of mothers and newborns who are participating in three ECHO cohorts:

  • The MADRES study, a predominantly lower income Hispanic cohort in Los Angeles, California
  • The NHBCS, a primarily non-Hispanic white cohort in northern New England
  • The PROTECT study, a Hispanic cohort in northern Puerto Rico.

 

What happened during the study?

The research team combined data from the three cohorts to measure multiple metals in the mothers’ urine samples collected during pregnancy. They then looked at associations between seven metals and birth weight for gestational age using a multi-chemical mixture approach. Birth weight for gestational age is commonly used as a measure for fetal growth.

 

What happens next?

Since antimony may harm fetal growth, it is important to identify major sources of exposure to this metal so that exposure can be reduced for pregnant women. In future studies, the team would like to include more ECHO cohorts in their research, explore other indicators of metal exposures (such as placental measures of metals), and identify time periods when toxic and essential metal exposures are most harmful or beneficial for pregnant women and their children.

 

Where can I learn more?

The full journal article, titled “Prenatal metal(loid) mixtures and birth weight for gestational age: a pooled analysis of three cohorts participating in the ECHO Program” is published in Environment International.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published March 01, 2022

 

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Exposures and Pregnancy

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, et al.

How Chemical Exposures in Pregnancy Affect Gene Changes in the Placenta

Author(s): Alison Paquette, Sheela Sathyanarayana, MD, MPH, et al.

How Environmental Exposures Affect Child Health Across Multiple Generations

Author(s): Carrie Breton, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al