Smoking During Pregnancy Linked to Mental Health Challenges in Children, ECHO Study Finds

Authors: Kristine Marceau, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

Previous research has shown that children whose mothers smoked during pregnancy are more likely to develop behavior problems, particularly difficulties with acting out or following rules. However, it has been less clear whether prenatal smoking also increases the risk of mental health problems generally, or if it’s a specific risk for difficulties with acting out or following rules alone. Researchers from this study wanted to understand whether prenatal smoking contributes to co-occurring emotional and behavioral symptoms or specifically behavioral symptoms, and whether its effects differ by age or sex. This study helps address these gaps by examining which developmental periods may be especially sensitive to prenatal smoking effects and whether boys or girls are more vulnerable.

What were the study results?

Children exposed to smoking before birth were more likely experience multiple co‑occurring emotional and behavioral symptoms, and also to show more externalizing problems—such as attention problems, aggressive behavior, and rule‑breaking. These associations were observed across nearly all age groups and remained even after accounting for family history, background, and other exposures.

The strongest effects on mental health symptoms were seen in early childhood (under age 7) and early puberty (ages 9 to 12). There were very few differences between boys and girls. Only at ages 13-14 did boys seem to have more co‑occurring emotional and behavioral symptoms and externalizing-specific problems than girls. In general, both boys and girls were affected in similar ways.

What was the study's impact?

These results suggest that prenatal exposure to nicotine may increase the risk of mental health and behavioral problems. Because this study included a large number of children from different backgrounds, it helps clarify past research and contributes new insight about when certain problems tend to appear and how different symptoms may occur together.

Who was involved?

The study included 16,335 children and adolescents ages 1 to 18 from 55 U.S. ECHO Cohort Study Sites. All participants completed Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) behavioral assessments.

What happened during the study?

Researchers gathered standardized information about children’s behavior and created a simple score to show how many symptoms a child had and whether those symptoms were more emotional (such as sadness, anxiety) or behavioral (such as acting out, rule breaking). They then looked at these patterns across different age groups, while taking into account important factors such as the mother’s age and education, family mental health history, and exposure to smoke or other substances during and after pregnancy.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What happens next?

Future work could help researchers understand how timing, dose, and frequency of smoking during pregnancy correlates with child mental health. Future research could also use methods to separate the effects of family background from the effects of smoking itself and look more closely at how nicotine and other chemicals in smoke might affect children’s development.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Prenatal Smoking and Child Psychopathology Associations by Age and Sex in the ECHO Cohort,” in Development and Psychopathology.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published April 6, 2026

Read the associated news release.

Download this summary

Smoking During Pregnancy Linked to Mental Health Challenges in Children, ECHO Study Finds

Prenatal Smoking Associated with Higher Risk of Mental Health Challenges in Children

Posted on April 6, 2026April 6, 2026 by Jodi Snare

Mother and toddler laughing Children exposed to maternal smoking before birth are more likely to experience behavioral and mental health challenges, according to a large study funded by the National Institutes of Health’s Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program.

While previous research had linked prenatal smoking to acting out or rule-breaking, it was less clear whether smoking during pregnancy also affects broader mental health outcomes and whether effects differ by sex. The new study sheds light on these questions, examining thousands of children across the U.S. and identifying periods when exposure may be most impactful.

“These findings show that prenatal nicotine exposure can affect more than just acting-out types of behavior problems—it can influence children’s overall mental health and experiences of both emotional and behavioral problems at the same time,” said Kristine Marceau, PhD, of Purdue University. “Understanding when kids are most vulnerable can help families and healthcare providers provide support at the right time.”

Researchers analyzed data from 16,335 children ages 1 to 18 from 55 ECHO Cohort Study Sites. Behavioral assessments measured emotional and behavioral symptoms using standardized questionnaires.

Key Findings

Widespread Impact: Children exposed to prenatal smoking were more likely to have multiple mental health or behavioral symptoms at the same time.
Critical Windows: The strongest effects appeared in early childhood (under age 7) and early puberty (ages 9–12).
Similar Effects for Boys and Girls: Both sexes were affected in comparable ways, with slightly higher symptom levels in boys only at ages 13–14.
Independent of Family Background: Associations persisted even after considering family history and other environmental factors, such as maternal age, education, and additional substance exposures.

Future studies could take a closer look at the timing, amount, and frequency of smoking during pregnancy. Researchers could also work to better understand which effects are due to smoking itself—rather than other family factors—and how nicotine and other chemicals in smoke may affect how children grow and develop.

This collaborative research, titled “Prenatal Smoking and Child Psychopathology Associations by Age and Sex in the ECHO Cohort,” is published in Development and Psychopathology.

Media Contacts

For information or to request an interview, contact Rebekah Yeager, rebekah.yeager@nih.gov.

If you are not a member of the media, but have a general inquiry, please contact NIHKidsandEnvironment@od.nih.gov.

Connect With Us

Check out the recent issues of our bi-monthly newsletter, the ECHO Connector, for program news and the latest research findings.

To receive the ECHO Connector through email, subscribe here.

Follow the ECHO Program on LinkedIn and X for the latest updates.

Family Lifestyle and Behavior Changes During COVID-19 Pandemic Associated with Youth Mental Health

Posted on February 11, 2026February 11, 2026 by Jodi Snare

Children and teens who experienced significant changes in their lifestyle and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic may be more likely to experience symptoms of pandemic-related post-traumatic stress (PTS), according to a recent ECHO Cohort study led by Amy Margolis, PhD of The Ohio State University.

The United States is facing a growing youth mental health crisis with a significant increase in mental or behavioral health conditions, partly linked to changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand how changes in family hardships, behaviors, and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced youth PTS symptoms, researchers collected information from 7,786 children and 1,353 teens and young adults and their parents or caregivers across the United States between April 2020 and August 2021.

Key Takeaways include:

Two groups of families were identified based on their experiences of hardships, changes in daily behaviors, and coping strategies during COVID-19. The first group had minimal changes in their lifestyle and behaviors, while the second group had significant changes. The low change group included a higher proportion of Black families, single-parent households, and lower income and education levels.
Children and teens in the group with significant changes had higher Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS) scores compared to the group with minimal changes.
Some aspects of parent or caregiver experiences, including their ability to isolate during the pandemic, were associated with lower PTSS scores in children. Youth whose parents or caregivers reported no change in their own behaviors were more likely to report lower PTSS scores.
Changes in youth health behaviors (like eating, physical activity, and media use) and access to healthcare were important factors associated with PTSS scores. Stability in these areas was linked to lower PTSS scores.
The use of coping strategies by children and teens did not significantly reduce PTSS scores. Some coping strategies, like increased media use and substance use, were linked to higher PTSS scores.

This study provides valuable insight that could help improve youth mental health now and in the wake of future public health emergencies. It demonstrates the importance of stability in health behaviors, access to healthcare, and the ability for parents to isolate safely as key factors in reducing youth PTS symptoms.

This collaborative research, titled “Changes to Family Life, Youth COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress, and the Youth Mental Health Crisis,” is published in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

Read the research summary.

Courtney K Blackwell, PhD, MEd: The kids are(n’t) alright: The role of social media in youth mental health

The kids are(n’t) alright: The role of social media in youth mental health

Key Takeaways: The parallel rise of youth mental health problems and social media use has led to speculations that the latter is a key contributor to the former. The US Surgeon General’s Advisory bolstered such speculations with a recent report detailing the potential harmful effects of social media use on youth mental health. However, others suggest engaging in social media can have positive psychological influences by increasing social connectedness and providing opportunities for creative self-expression and identity exploration. Dr. Blackwell will explore this duality by reviewing what we know about youth social media use and mental health outcomes, highlighting recent and on-going ECHO studies on this topic. She will also provide insight into the ECHO media use data more broadly to inspire future work leveraging the ECHO Cohort.

Courtney K Blackwell, PhD, MEd
she/her/hers
Associate Professor
Department of Medical Social Sciences (Outcome and Measurement Science)
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
MPI, ECHO Measurement Core

Biography:

Courtney Blackwell, PhD, MEd, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Medical Social Sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. She is the MPI of the ECHO Measurement Core and has expertise in the development, validation, and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and population health surveys for use across the lifespan, general and clinical populations, and health domains. Her research on pediatric mental health and well-being emphasizes promotive and protective factors of children’s positive psychological health. With a background in communication studies and the effects of digital media on child development, Dr. Blackwell has spent the past 10 years collaborating with such organizations as Common Sense Media, Sesame Workshop, PBS, Google, and Code.org on national surveys of children’s media use, the development and evaluation of educational media products, and investigations of the effects of digital media on children’s learning and development. She is also a Faculty Affiliate with the Northwestern University Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences (“DevSci”) and the Northwestern Institute for Adolescent Mental Health and Well-Being.

Download the slide presentation

ECHO Study Examines the Effects of COVID-19–Related Changes in Caregiver and Child Behavior on Youth Mental Health

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Examines the Effects of COVID-19–Related Changes in Caregiver and Child Behavior on Youth Mental Health

Authors: Amy Margolis, Andrew Law, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

The United States is facing a growing youth mental health crisis with a significant increase in mental or behavioral health conditions, partly linked to changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined changes in family hardships, behaviors, and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluated whether these changes were associated with youth pandemic-related post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms.

What were the study results?

The study identified two groups of families based on their experiences of hardships, changes in daily behaviors, and coping strategies during COVID-19. The first group had minimal changes in their lifestyle and behaviors, while the second group had significant changes. The low change group included a higher proportion of Black families, single-parent households, and lower income and education levels.

Children and teens in the group with significant changes had higher Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS) scores compared to the group with minimal changes. Some aspects of parent or caregiver experiences, including their ability to isolate during the pandemic, were associated with lower PTSS scores in children. Youth whose parents or caregivers reported no change in their own behaviors were more likely to report lower PTSS scores. Changes in youth health behaviors (like eating, physical activity, and media use) and access to healthcare were important factors related to PTSS scores. Stability in these areas was linked to lower PTSS scores. The use of coping strategies by children and teens did not significantly reduce PTSS scores. Some coping strategies, like increased media use and substance use, were linked to higher PTSS scores.

What was the study's impact?

This study provides valuable insight that could help improve youth mental health now and in the wake of future public health emergencies. It demonstrates the importance of stability in health behaviors, access to healthcare, and the ability to isolate safely as key factors in reducing youth PTS symptoms.

Who was involved?

The participants included 9,139 youth and their parents or caregivers from across the United States, including 7,786 children (aged 2-12 years) and 1,353 teens and young adults (aged 13-21 years).

What happened during the study?

The study looked at information from ECHO families between April 2020 and August 2021 to understand how the pandemic affected them. Researchers grouped families into different categories based on their experiences and background characteristics from before the pandemic. The researchers then looked at symptoms of PTS in both children and teens within these family groups. The study explored how COVID-19 influenced family hardships, changes in parent and child behavior, and the ways families coped.

What happens next?

Future studies could help researchers examine what factors contribute to ongoing PTS symptoms or the occurrence of mental health diagnoses. Interviewing participants about acute stress when collecting PTSS survey responses could also help researchers confirm the validity of the survey.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Changes to Family Life, Youth COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress, and the Youth Mental Health Crisis,” in the Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published October 17, 2025

Read the associated article.

Download this summary

ECHO Study Examines the Effects of COVID-19–Related Changes in Caregiver and Child Behavior on Youth Mental Health

For Teens’ Mental Health, Strong Friendships Matter More Than Social Media Use, NIH Study Finds

Posted on March 12, 2025August 27, 2025 by Jodi Snare

Teens who report strong, high-quality friendships tend to have better mental health—an influence that appears nearly three times stronger than the link between social media use and mental health challenges, according to a new study funded by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program at the National Institutes of Health.

Today’s teens spend a lot of time online. This has raised concerns about how digital interactions affect teens’ well-being. As social media use has grown, some wonder if it’s playing a role in the rise of teen mental health challenges. Such concerns prompted the U.S. Surgeon General to issue a warning in 2023 about the potential impact of social media on youth mental health.

“Social media use does not occur in a vacuum—it’s one piece of a much larger picture,” said Courtney K. Blackwell, PhD, of Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine. “Our study found that peer relationships seem to matter a lot more than social media when it comes to teen mental health outcomes.”

In the study, researchers found that a teen with strong, supportive friendships is likely to experience positive mental health, regardless of how much time they spend on social media. By contrast, teens who report poor-quality friendships and nearly the same level of social media use are more likely to report poor mental health. In comparison, the amount of time spent using social media had a much smaller influence on teen mental health outcomes.

Teens ages 13 to 18 reported how much time they spend on social media and whether they use it actively (like posting and commenting) or passively (like scrolling and browsing). Researchers used the PROMIS® assessment tools and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to measure their mental well-being, including life satisfaction, sense of purpose, symptoms of depression, and the quality of their friendships.

A 2021 national survey of 8th and 10th graders, cited in the U.S. Surgeon General’s report on social media and youth mental health, found that teens spent an average of 3.5 hours daily on social media. More recently, a 2023 Gallup survey of 13- to 19-year-olds reported that the average had increased to 4.8 hours per day.

The study included 963 teens aged 13 to 18 from across the United States. Teens completed surveys on social media habits, peer relationship quality, and mental health outcomes. The results provide insight into how social media use and mental health influence each other during the teenage years, extending beyond negative outcomes like anxiety and depression to also include positive mental health indicators.

“Instead of just focusing on limiting adolescents’ social media use, perhaps emphasizing ways to bolster the quality of their social relationships would help address the current youth mental health crisis in the U.S.,” said Dr. Blackwell.

Looking ahead, the research team plans to use data collected over time to understand better how social media use and mental health influence each other during this sensitive development period. Future studies could focus on improving peer relationship quality as a pathway to better teen mental health outcomes.

This collaborative research was published in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

Media Contacts

For information or to request an interview, contact Rebekah Yeager, rebekah.yeager@nih.gov.

If you are not a member of the media, but have a general inquiry, please contact NIHKidsandEnvironment@od.nih.gov.

Connect With Us

Check out the recent issues of our bi-monthly newsletter, the ECHO Connector, for program news and the latest research findings.

To receive the ECHO Connector through email, subscribe here.

Follow @ECHOChildHealth for the latest ECHO Program updates on X.

Strong Friendships Matter More than Time Spent on Social Media for Adolescent Mental Health, ECHO Study Finds

<< Back to Research Summaries

Strong Friendships Matter More than Time Spent on Social Media for Adolescent Mental Health, ECHO Study Finds

Authors: Courtney K. Blackwell, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

Teens spend a significant amount of time using social media, raising questions about how their digital and social experiences intersect. Recent concerns outlined by the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory suggest potential negative influences of social media on youth mental health. A 2021 national survey of 8th and 10th graders, cited in the U.S. Surgeon General’s report on social media and youth mental health, found that teens spent an average of 3.5 hours per day on social media. More recently, a 2023 Gallup survey of 13- to 19-year-olds reported that the average had increased to 4.8 hours per day. While a large number of previous studies focus on negative mental health outcomes such as depression and anxiety, ECHO researchers examined teen social media use in relation to both positive and negative mental health effects.

What were the study results?

High-quality peer relationships were the strongest predictor of teen well-being, regardless of social media use, with a magnitude nearly three times as large as the association between social media use and poor mental health. Teens who reported high quality peer relationships were more likely to experience positive mental health, while teens who reported poor quality relationships were more likely to report worse mental health, even at similar levels of social media use.

What was the study's impact?

The study highlights the importance of improving the quality of peer relationships rather than merely limiting social media use to enhance teens’ mental health.

Who was involved?

The study included 963 teens aged 13 to 18 from three ECHO Cohort Study Sites across the United States.

What happened during the study?

Teens ages 13 to 18 reported how much time they spend on social media and whether they use it actively (like posting and commenting) or passively (like scrolling and browsing). Researchers used the PROMIS® assessment tools and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to measure teens’ mental well-being, including life satisfaction, sense of purpose, symptoms of depression, and the quality of their friendships.

What happens next?

Studying social media use and mental health over the course of adolescence could help researchers better understand how these factors influence each other throughout this sensitive stage of development. Future research could also focus on finding ways to strengthen peer relationships to support teens' mental health.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Adolescent social media use and mental health in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO),” in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published February 5, 2025

Download this summary

Strong Friendships Matter More than Time Spent on Social Media for Adolescent Mental Health, ECHO Study Finds

ECHO Cohort Study Finds Amount of Time Spent in Childcare Not Associated With Mental Health Risks in Young Children, Including Those Facing Family Challenges

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Cohort Study Finds Amount of Time Spent in Childcare Not Associated With Mental Health Risks in Young Children, Including Those Facing Family Challenges

Authors: Michelle Bosquet Enlow, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

Children who face early life adversity—such as parental mental illness and household economic hardship—may be at a higher risk for mental health difficulties. Researchers in this study wanted to examine the extent to which attending out-of-home childcare might buffer or magnify the effects of those experiences.

In the U.S., many children under age 5 spend some time in nonparental childcare. However, previous findings on the role of childcare in child mental health have produced mixed results. While many studies highlight positive associations with attending childcare, some raise concerns that childcare may increase the risk for poor child developmental outcomes.

What were the study results?

The study found that children with higher exposure to factors such as family stress and mental illness were more likely to have higher levels of internalizing symptoms (such as anxiety or depression) and externalizing symptoms (such as aggression and hyperactivity), especially if their families also faced socioeconomic hardship. However, researchers also found that the number of hours in childcare did not seem to change the effects of these risks on children’s mental health, nor was childcare attendance significantly associated with improvement or worsening of their symptoms overall. This was true whether they looked at all types of non-parent childcare that were included in the study—including center-based care, home-based non-relative care, and care by a relative—or looked at just center-based care.

What was the study's impact?

The study found that the amount of time spent in childcare didn’t have a clear positive or negative effect on children’s mental health. The findings suggest that challenges like social or emotional stressors and financial hardships should be looked at separately to better understand the risks to children’s mental health in early life.

Who was involved?

The participants in the study were a diverse sample of 2,024 parent-child pairs from three ECHO Cohort Study Sites. Participants were recruited from hospitals in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee, as well as from U.S. adoption agencies across the United States.

What happened during the study?

The study collected data on the type and frequency of childcare attendance from birth to age 3 years. It also looked at early life challenges during that time, such as whether parents had experienced difficult childhood events, showed signs of depression, or had certain factors like age, education, or relationship status that could affect their child’s well-being. Between ages 3 and 5.5 years, the study evaluated children’s symptoms such as anxiety, depression, aggression, or hyperactivity. By following these children over time, researchers could explore the associations among early adversity, childcare attendance, and child mental health outcomes.

Note: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What happens next?

Future work could examine how and whether childcare quality is associated with child mental health, including whether high-quality care may be associated with a reduction of any adverse effects of early adversity on child outcomes.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article titled “The Influence of Early Childhood Education and Care on the Relation between Early Life Social Adversity and Children’s Mental Health in the Environmental influences for Child Health Outcomes Program” in Development and Psychopathology.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published December 2024

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

ECHO Cohort Study Finds Amount of Time Spent in Childcare Not Associated With Mental Health Risks in Young Children, Including Those Facing Family Challenges

NIH Study Finds No Significant Link Between Time Spent in Childcare and Young Children’s Mental Health, Even Amid Early Adversity

Posted on December 17, 2024August 27, 2025 by Jodi Snare

Sending children to childcare outside the home may not significantly affect children’s mental health, according to a new study funded by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program at the National Institutes of Health. This finding holds true even for children who face challenges, such as a parent’s mental illness or financial struggles at home.

Many children in the U.S. under the age of 5 years spend some time in childcare outside the home. Researchers wanted to learn whether attending childcare influenced the mental health of children, particularly those who had experienced early adversity.

“Despite the extensive use of childcare in the U.S. and documented benefits, there are still some concerns that childcare attendance (vs. staying at home with a parent) increases the risk for poor child outcomes,” said Michelle Bosquet Enlow, PhD, of Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. “This can lead to considerable feelings of guilt and worry for parents who use childcare.”

The study looked at various forms of childcare, including center-based care, home-based non-relative care, and care by a relative. However, previous findings on the role of childcare in child mental health have produced mixed results. While many studies highlight positive associations with attending childcare, some raise concerns that childcare may increase the risk for poor child developmental outcomes. “Understanding how childcare can influence children's development, especially for those facing extra challenges, can help shape public policies that promote healthy outcomes for kids,” said Dr. Bosquet Enlow.

Key Findings

Children facing early life adversity were more likely to have higher levels of anxiety, depression, aggression, or hyperactivity symptoms.
Childcare attendance did not seem to be associated with increased or decreased levels of mental health symptoms, including among children facing adversity.
The study did not find any evidence that the number of hours in childcare corresponded to worse mental health outcomes for children, even those at elevated psychosocial and socioeconomic risk.

The findings suggest that while children facing higher levels of stress, mental illness in the family, and economic hardship were more likely to have higher levels of internalizing symptoms (such as anxiety and depression) and externalizing symptoms (such as aggression and hyperactivity), number of hours in childcare did not appear to play a significant role in altering these outcomes.

About the study

The study followed 2,024 parent-child pairs from three diverse U.S. research groups within the ECHO Cohort. Participants were recruited from hospitals in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee, as well as from adoption agencies across the United States.

Researchers measured children’s childcare experiences from birth to age 3 years and examined parental factors like childhood adversity, depression, and education level. Between ages 3 and 5.5 years, the children’s mental health was assessed for symptoms like anxiety, depression, and aggression.

This collaborative research was published in Development and Psychopathology.

Bosquet Enlow, M., et al. (2024) The Influence of Early Childhood Education and Care on the Relation between Early Life Social Adversity and Children’s Mental Health in the Environmental influences for Child Health Outcomes Program. Development and Psychopathology. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579424001822

###

About ECHO: Launched in 2016, the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program is a research program in the Office of the Director at the NIH with the mission to enhance the health of children for generations to come. ECHO investigators study the effects of a broad range of early environmental influences on child health and development. For more information, visit echochildren.org.

About the NIH: NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information, visit www.nih.gov.

Media Contacts

For information or to request an interview, contact Rebekah Yeager, rebekah.yeager@nih.gov.

If you are not a member of the media, but have a general inquiry, please contact NIHKidsandEnvironment@od.nih.gov.

Connect With Us

Check out the recent issues of our bi-monthly newsletter, the ECHO Connector, for program news and the latest research findings.

To receive the ECHO Connector through email, subscribe here.

Follow @ECHOChildHealth for the latest ECHO Program updates on X.