New ECHO Research Finds Pregnant People are Exposed to Dangerous Chemicals Found in a Variety of Household Products

Collaborative ECHO research led by Giehae Choi, PhD and Jessie Buckley, PhD, both of Johns Hopkins University, along with Tracey Woodruff, PhD, MPH of the University of California, San Francisco, investigates whether pregnant people are exposed to potentially dangerous chemicals commonly found in a variety of household products, including plastics, disinfectants, and products that contain dyes or pigments. Two of these chemicals, melamine and cyanuric acid, were found in over 99% of study participants, and exposure to four different types of aromatic amines were also found in nearly all participants. Levels of these chemicals were higher among participants of color and those exposed to tobacco smoke. This research, titled “Exposure to melamine and its derivatives and aromatic amines among pregnant women in the United States: The ECHO Program,” is published in Chemosphere.

This research focused on melamine, along with related chemicals like cyanuric acid and aromatic amines. Even though these chemicals are found in a wide variety of household products, their exposures are not regularly monitored in human populations. In general, people can be exposed to harmful chemicals through the air, contaminated food, household dust, water, plastics, products that contain dyes and pigments, tobacco smoke, diesel fumes, and more. Melamine is known to cause health problems in children, but there is limited research on its effects in pregnant people, and in adults in general.

To address this gap, this study used new methods to measure the levels of 45 chemicals in urine samples from 171 pregnant people across nine ECHO cohorts. Of these participants, 40% were Hispanic, 34% were White, 20% were Black, 4% were Asians, and the remaining 2% were from other or multiple racial groups. The researchers also examined data on the participants’ race and ethnicity, age, education, and marital status to determine whether chemical exposure was higher in different sociodemographic groups. Levels of most chemicals were higher among Black and Hispanic women. For example, levels of 3,4-dichloroaniline—a chemical used in the production of dyes and pesticides—were more than 100% higher among Black and Hispanic women compared to White women.

“This is the first national study to reveal that pregnant people in the U.S. are widely exposed to melamine, cyanuric acid, and aromatic amines—chemicals that may be harmful to maternal health and child development,” said Dr. Choi. “This raises concerns for the health of pregnant people and babies.”

Future research will expand this study to include over 1,700 pregnant people and investigate whether higher exposure to these chemicals during pregnancy might be related to negative child health outcomes.

Read the research summary.

Ongoing ECHO Research Investigates the Effects of Preterm Birth and Environmental Exposures on Child Health Outcomes

A recent review paper authored by Michael O’Shea, MD of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Monica McGrath, PhD of Johns Hopkins University, and Judy Aschner, MD of Hackensack University, and Barry Lester, PhD of Brown University’s Alpert Medical School provides an overview of the collaborative work ECHO has been doing to study and collect data on the effects of premature birth on child health outcomes. The article describes ECHO cohorts that have enrolled premature infants (born before 32 weeks of gestation) between April 2002 and March 2020, including three ECHO cohorts that are almost exclusively comprised of preterm infants. Researchers can use ECHO data to investigate the relationship between preterm birth, environmental exposures, and childhood chronic and developmental health conditions. This research, titled “Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes: Cohorts of Individuals Born Very Preterm,” is published in Pediatric Research.

The ECHO Cohorts included in this review recruited almost 1,800 preterm infants from 14 states. ECHO researchers are collecting extensive data from these preterm infants, including data on learning and intellectual impairments, asthma, obesity, sleep health, and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers can use this data to address questions about 1) the effect of preterm birth on a child’s risk for chronic and developmental health conditions; 2) socioeconomic disparities in child health outcomes; and 3) the relationship between early life exposures and health outcomes later in life among individuals born preterm.

“Our goal is for this review article to serve as a ‘roadmap’ to aid child health researchers in their efforts to apply data from the ECHO preterm cohorts toward the broad goals of the ECHO program,” said Dr. O’Shea. “This resource provides researchers with many opportunities to improve their understanding of modifiable risk factors and mechanisms leading to chronic illness in children, pointing the way towards interventions that can optimize the well-being of children in the United States.”

Researchers not affiliated with the ECHO Program will be able to obtain de-identified data from very preterm children in the ECHO-wide Cohort, along with data from around 30,000 children born at term through a controlled-access public use database. This data will include information about a broad range of environmental exposures and outcomes related to chronic illness among children in the United States. Using this data, researchers can continue to build off of ECHO’s mission to enhance the health of children through research that may help inform healthcare practices, programs, and policies.

Read the research summary.

ECHO Study Identifies Biological, Behavioral, and Social Factors Affecting Pregnancy Health

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Identifies Biological, Behavioral, and Social Factors Affecting Pregnancy Health

Authors: Stephanie Eick, Rachel Morello-Frosch, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Pregnant people who were over 30 years old and had a college degree had lower levels of oxidative stress. Levels of oxidative stress were higher among pregnant people who were overweight or obese and unmarried. Also, current smokers or those with less than a high school education had higher levels of a oxidative stress biomarker. These results help identify how social, biologic, and behavioral factors may contribute to poor health in mothers and children.

 

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This is the largest study to date looking at the relationship between biological, social, and behavioral factors and oxidative stress during pregnancy. The results of this study provide important clues into how socioeconomic inequalities can contribute to poor health in pregnant people. This study may also inform future studies looking at risk factors for preterm birth.

 

Why was this study needed?

There is little data on what can cause oxidative stress during pregnancy. Oxidative stress is a process that can trigger cell damage and it is thought to play a role in the development of some diseases. By identifying biological, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors in a mother’s day-to-day life that may lead to increased risk for oxidative stress, research can help inform the development of targeted strategies for the prevention of poor prenatal health outcomes.

 

Who was involved?

This study involved approximately 2,000 pregnant people in the mainland United States and Puerto Rico who were enrolled in one of four ECHO cohorts.

 

What happened during the study?

Researchers collected urine samples from participants and measured the levels of biomarkers for oxidative stress. Researchers calculated how levels of oxidative stress biomarkers changed in response to biological, behavioral, and social factors. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, marital/partnered status, parity, and smoking status were included as biological and behavioral factors while race/ethnicity, maternal education, and stressful life events were considered social factors.

 

What happens next?

The research team is examining the impact of oxidative stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth.

 

Where can I learn more?

The full journal article, titled “Associations between social, biologic, and behavioral factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress during pregnancy: Findings from four ECHO cohorts” is published in Science of the Total Environment.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published April 29, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Author(s): Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Assessing Links between Multiple Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Birthweight Using Exposure Continuum Mapping

Author(s): John L. Pearce, Brian Neelon, Michael S. Bloom, Jessie P. Buckley, Cande V. Ananth, Frederica Perera, John Vena, and Kelly Hunt

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

Assessment of Chemical Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands

Author(s): Brett Doherty and Megan Romano

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

Informed Mothers More Likely to Engage in Collective Action, Reduce Family- and Community-Level Chemical Exposures

<< Back to Research Summaries

Informed Mothers More Likely to Engage in Collective Action, Reduce Family- and Community-Level Chemical Exposures

Authors: Amy Padula, Rachel Morello-Frosch, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, the Office of the Director, and the National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

This study found that participants knew about the dangers of chemical exposures and were motivated to act to protect the health of their families and communities, although they have busy family lives, and the pandemic has further prevented them from participating in collective action. Participants requested strategies that were time-efficient and included straightforward, accessible information on how to reduce exposures at the personal and community level.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

Researchers have an opportunity to directly learn from participants about how to improve the way in which chemical exposure results are reported in future studies. Report-back systems, or ways that study results are returned to participants, can present valuable information for participants about environmental health and how to lower chemical exposures in their homes and communities, and hold policy makers responsible for protecting parents and children from harmful chemical exposures. Researchers can use tools like the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI) to give their participants access to individualized chemical results with information about how to take individual and collective action to reduce exposures.

 

Why was this study needed?

Participants in chemical exposure studies who receive reports on their personal exposures often look for information to reduce those exposures. Many chemical exposures are the result of policies, regulations, and practices, not individual behaviors and lifestyles. Individuals can address those policies and regulations through collective action, which is working with others to reach a common goal. Researchers wanted to understand the role of personal exposure reports in a participant’s interest in engagement in collective action.

 

Who was involved?

In summer 2020, the researchers held three online focus groups in English and Spanish with a diverse group of 18 participants from pregnancy cohorts in Illinois and California.

 

What happened during the study?

This study aimed to understand how much participants know about sources of potentially harmful chemical exposures and their experience and interest in participating in collective action. Focus group participants talked about some of the barriers and strategies to participating in collective action, and their preferences for receiving and using their personalized reports about environmental chemical exposures. Input from these focus groups can be used to help design tools and content to report results of exposure research to ECHO participants.

 

What happens next?

The researchers are currently studying participant surveys from before and after participants received their chemical exposure reports to learn more about how participants use DERBI. These surveys may also reveal how DERBI reports may influence participant efforts to reduce exposure in their homes and communities through collective action.

 

Where can I learn more?

More information about the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI) can be found on the Silent Spring Institute website.

Access the full journal article, titled “Perspectives of peripartum people on opportunities for personal and collective action to reduce exposure to everyday chemicals: Focus groups to inform exposure report-back” in Environmental Research.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published March 26, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Chemical Exposures and Pregnancy

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Author(s): Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Assessing Links between Multiple Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Birthweight Using Exposure Continuum Mapping

Author(s): John L. Pearce, Brian Neelon, Michael S. Bloom, Jessie P. Buckley, Cande V. Ananth, Frederica Perera, John Vena, and Kelly Hunt

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

Assessment of Chemical Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands

Author(s): Brett Doherty and Megan Romano

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

ECHO Researchers Explore How Study Results Can Help Pregnant Mothers Take Action to Reduce Chemical Exposures

Collaborative ECHO research led by Amy Padula, PhD, MSc from the University of California, San Francisco and Rachel Morello-Frosch, PhD, MPH from the University of California, Berkeley found that many ECHO participants are motivated to engage in individual and collective action to protect their families and communities from the negative effects of chemical exposures. These findings may be used to improve report-back of chemical results and shift responsibility of chemical exposures from individuals to policymakers.

“When it comes to chemical exposure results, participants were interested in receiving timely, accessible, and straightforward information on how to reduce chemical exposures at the personal and community level,” said Dr. Padula.

This research, titled “Perspectives of peripartum people on opportunities for personal and collective action to reduce exposure to everyday chemicals: Focus groups to inform exposure report-back,” is published in Environmental Research.

In the summer of 2020, the researchers held three online focus groups with a diverse set of 18 mothers from ECHO pregnancy cohorts in Illinois and California. Focus groups, held in both English and Spanish, involved discussions around knowledge of chemical exposures and their sources, chemical exposure report-back preferences, and participants’ interest and willingness to engage in collective action.

Study results demonstrate the usefulness of chemical exposure report-back tools, like the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI), for informing and empowering research participants. “Report-back can provide opportunities for participants to learn more about environmental health and how to lower exposure both in their homes and in their communities,” said Dr. Padula.

The next steps for this research include examining surveys from participants who are using DERBI to learn about their chemical exposures. These surveys may reveal more about how chemical exposure reports influence participant engagement with collective action efforts. Drs. Padula and Morello-Frosch encourage other ECHO cohorts to use DERBI to report back individual chemical results to their participants.

More information about the Digital Exposure Report Back Interface (DERBI) or how to use DERBI in your cohort, please visit the Silent Spring Institute website.

Read the Research Summary.

Study Reveals Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

<< Back to Research Summaries

Study Shows Rising Levels of Plastics, Pesticides, and Replacement Chemicals in Pregnant Women

Authors: Jessie P. Buckley, Tracey J. Woodruff, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Most of the chemicals were found in at least one of the women in the study and about a third of the chemicals were found in greater than half of the participants. One fifth of the chemicals were detected in over 90% of the pregnant women indicating widespread exposure to the chemicals measured.

The study found some chemicals were detected more often or were present in higher amounts in non-white women, those with lower education, those who were single, and those exposed to tobacco. Hispanic women had higher levels of some chemicals not included in previous biomonitoring studies including parabens (preservatives) as well as phthalates and bisphenols (from plastics).

The study found that levels of some of the chemicals used as replacements for more toxic ones that were banned or phased out, increased over time and were present in higher amounts than have been seen in previous studies. The levels of several phased out chemicals were found to remain stable or decrease over time.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This is the largest study to date to measure exposure to a wide variety of environmental chemicals in a diverse group of pregnant women across the U.S. The results of this study highlight the widespread and unequal exposure of pregnant women to chemicals from air pollution, food, water, plastics, and other industrial and consumer products.

 

Why was this study needed?

There is little data on exposure of pregnant women to many pesticides and industrial chemicals, even those that could be harmful during pregnancy and throughout childhood development.

 

Who was involved?

The study included 171 women from five U.S. states and Puerto Rico who were part of an ECHO cohort. Of these women, 60% were Black or Hispanic.

 

What happened during the study?

Research team members measured 89 biomarkers for more than 100 chemicals in urine samples from pregnant women in nine ECHO cohorts. Most of the chemicals can be found in pesticides, plastics, sunscreens, personal care products, and flame retardants. Many of the chemicals measured are replacement chemicals: chemicals meant to replace other harmful chemicals (e.g., BPA, phthalates). The team used a new method that measured multiple chemicals in a single urine sample to determine if pregnant women were exposed to the chemicals. The researchers then studied how different factors—such as age, race, education level, and the year the sample was collected—related to the levels of chemicals found.

 

What happens next?

The research team will continue to study exposures in a larger, diverse population of pregnant women (more than 6,500) to see whether these prenatal chemical exposures are linked to negative birth outcomes. This data will be important for understanding the factors that may contribute to additional negative health effects during pregnancy and childhood.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article titled, “Exposure to contemporary and emerging chemicals in commerce among pregnant women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program” in Environment Science & Technology.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published May 10, 2022

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Chemical Exposures and Pregnancy

Effects of Metal Mixture Exposure During Pregnancy on Fetal Growth

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, Megan E. Romano, et al.

Assessing Links between Multiple Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Birthweight Using Exposure Continuum Mapping

Author(s): John L. Pearce, Brian Neelon, Michael S. Bloom, Jessie P. Buckley, Cande V. Ananth, Frederica Perera, John Vena, and Kelly Hunt

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

Assessment of Chemical Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands

Author(s): Brett Doherty and Megan Romano

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

Diverse, Multi-cohort ECHO Program Study Examines Factors Influencing Chemical Exposures in Pregnant Women

In a collaborative research effort involving participants from nine ECHO cohorts, Jessie P. Buckley, PhD, of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Tracey J. Woodruff, PhD, of the University of California San Francisco led a research team that examined chemical exposures in pregnant women. This is the largest exposure study to measure more than 100 contemporary and emerging chemicals simultaneously in a diverse population of pregnant women in the U.S. The researchers used a new method for measuring multiple chemicals in a small amount of urine.

The research team found that more than 80% of the chemicals were present in at least one of the women in the study, and about a third of the chemicals were found in a majority of the participants. The study found that the women had been exposed to rising levels of certain chemicals, especially replacement chemicals: chemicals meant to replace other chemicals that have been banned or phased out. Many of the women had also been exposed to neonicitinoids, a widely used type of pesticide.

Their research, titled “Exposure to contemporary and emerging chemicals in commerce among pregnant women in the United States: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program” is published in Environment Science & Technology.

This multi-cohort ECHO Program study included 171 pregnant women from California, Georgia, Illinois, New Hampshire, New York, and Puerto Rico. Approximately 34% of participants were white, 40% were Hispanic, and 20% were Black. To collect data, the research team used a new method that can identify up to 103 chemicals or chemical metabolites —mainly pesticides, plastics, and BPA/phthalate replacements—simultaneously from a single urine sample. The team determined detection frequencies and concentrations for each chemical in urine samples from women in each of nine ECHO cohorts and assessed how demographic characteristics and the year of sample collection related to measured levels of the chemicals.

The research team identified demographic and sociodemographic trends in chemical exposures, observing higher exposure levels among non-white women, those with lower educational attainment, those who were single, and those exposed to tobacco. Of note, Hispanic women had especially high levels of parabens (preservatives) as well as phthalates and bisphenols (from plastics) compared to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.

“Currently, there is a lack of data on multiple chemical exposures, particularly those that have been identified as potentially hazardous during pregnancy and fetal development,” said Buckley. “This study highlights the importance of including pregnant women in biomonitoring studies and creating policies and practices to decrease overall chemical exposure.”

In the future, the team plans to look at a larger sample of pregnant women. “We aim to increase the number of participants from about 200 to 6,500,” said Woodruff. “We would like to assess whether higher prenatal chemical exposures are related to adverse birth outcomes. This data will be foundational for evaluating contributions to additional adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes.”

Read the research summary.

ECHO Study Suggests Antimony Exposure During Pregnancy Contributes to Lower Birth Weight

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Suggests Antimony Exposure During Pregnancy Contributes to Lower Birth Weight

Authors: Caitlin Howe, Margaret R. Karagas, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Researchers found that combined exposure to all metals in the mixture did not affect birth weight.  Mothers with high levels of the metal antimony in their urine had smaller babies across all three of the ECHO cohorts. Two other metals – cadmium and molybdenum – had no impact on fetal growth. Findings for other metals (cobalt, mercury, nickel, tin) varied depending on the study population and whether the baby was male or female.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This study used an approach that looked at multiple chemicals at once, in contrast to previous studies that have typically evaluated one chemical at a time. The findings suggest that antimony, an understudied metalloid, may harm fetal growth in different populations across the United States.

 

Why was this study needed?

Exposure to toxic metals can harm fetal growth (how much a baby grows during pregnancy), while nutritionally essential metals can support fetal growth. Previous research studying the effects of metals during pregnancy on fetal growth has usually focused on one metal at a time. However, most people are exposed to multiple metals, which may have complex effects on fetal growth. Therefore, combining data from three ECHO cohorts representing different geographic regions in the U.S., the research team looked at how maternal exposure to multiple metals affects fetal growth, an important indicator of future health.

 

Who was involved?

This study included approximately 1,000 pairs of mothers and newborns who are participating in three ECHO cohorts:

  • The MADRES study, a predominantly lower income Hispanic cohort in Los Angeles, California
  • The NHBCS, a primarily non-Hispanic white cohort in northern New England
  • The PROTECT study, a Hispanic cohort in northern Puerto Rico.

 

What happened during the study?

The research team combined data from the three cohorts to measure multiple metals in the mothers’ urine samples collected during pregnancy. They then looked at associations between seven metals and birth weight for gestational age using a multi-chemical mixture approach. Birth weight for gestational age is commonly used as a measure for fetal growth.

 

What happens next?

Since antimony may harm fetal growth, it is important to identify major sources of exposure to this metal so that exposure can be reduced for pregnant women. In future studies, the team would like to include more ECHO cohorts in their research, explore other indicators of metal exposures (such as placental measures of metals), and identify time periods when toxic and essential metal exposures are most harmful or beneficial for pregnant women and their children.

 

Where can I learn more?

The full journal article, titled “Prenatal metal(loid) mixtures and birth weight for gestational age: a pooled analysis of three cohorts participating in the ECHO Program” is published in Environment International.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published March 01, 2022

 

Access the associated article.

Read More Research Summaries about Exposures and Pregnancy

Exposures to environmental chemicals and their effect on important molecules during pregnancy

Author(s): Brett T. Doherty, et al.

How Chemical Exposures in Pregnancy Affect Gene Changes in the Placenta

Author(s): Alison Paquette, Sheela Sathyanarayana, MD, MPH, et al.

Assessing Links between Multiple Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Birthweight Using Exposure Continuum Mapping

Author(s): John L. Pearce, Brian Neelon, Michael S. Bloom, Jessie P. Buckley, Cande V. Ananth, Frederica Perera, John Vena, and Kelly Hunt

How Environmental Exposures Affect Child Health Across Multiple Generations

Author(s): Carrie Breton, et al.

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

Assessment of Chemical Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands

Author(s): Brett Doherty and Megan Romano

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al

How Does Maternal PFAS Exposure Affect Prenatal Development?

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are long-lasting chemicals that can be found in many household materials, but not enough is known about pre- and perinatal negative health outcomes associated with PFAS exposure. Additionally, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, such as African American women and children, may be at more risk for PFAS exposure, worsening health disparities. Previous studies have linked PFAS exposure with negative infant health outcomes, such as lower birth weight, but little is known about the specific biological mechanisms that PFAS exposures disrupt during prenatal development.

Che-Jung Chang, PhD (left) and Donghai Liang, PhD (right) served as first and corresponding authors for this publication.

To investigate these mechanisms, Che-Jung Chang, PhD, Donghai Liang, PhD, and their team of ECHO researchers at Emory University looked at pregnancy and exposure data from more than 300 African American women enrolled in the Atlanta ECHO cohort from 2014-2018. Their research, titled “Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure, maternal metabolomic perturbation, and fetal growth in African American women: A meet-in-the-middle approach,” is published in Environment International.

As part of this study, the researchers analyzed the levels of PFAS in the participants’ blood samples along with the levels of a variety of small molecules that are known to be essential to prenatal development. The researchers then used statistical methods to look at how these chemical differences affected birth weights. The analysis found that PFAS exposures were linked with lower birth weights in babies that African American women delivered. These lower birth weights may have been associated with changes in the levels of a variety of essential metabolites and molecules, including amino acids, lipid/fatty acid, bile acids, and sex hormones.

The results of this study reveal some of the key chemical mechanisms that may be responsible for the effects of PFAS exposure on prenatal development. “The molecular mechanisms and biomarkers presented in this study warrant future investigation in targeted studies,” said Dr. Liang. “These investigations may help develop early detection and intervention strategies in both public health and clinical settings.”

Going forward, the team will take a closer look at how PFAS exposures are reflected in the levels of key small molecules in newborn babies. Additionally, team members hope to expand their chemical analysis in order to get a more holistic view of how PFAS exposures affect prenatal development.

Access the brief flash talk from the authors in the following video:

Access the research summary.

ECHO Study Links PFAS Exposure During Pregnancy to Lower Birth Weight for Black Mothers

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Links PFAS Exposure During Pregnancy to Lower Birth Weight for Black Mothers

Authors: Che-Jung Chang, Donghai Liang, et al.

 

Who sponsored this study?

This work was supported by the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program Opportunities and Infrastructure Fund, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, and the Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

Footnote: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

 

What were the study results?

Some PFAS exposures were linked to a greater risk of low birth weight for babies that African American women delivered. PFAS exposures were also associated with the changes in the levels of small molecules needed for the baby’s development. These molecules included amino acids, lipid/fatty acids, bile acids, and sex hormones.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

 

What was the study's impact?

This is one of the first studies researching the connections and relationships between exposures to PFAS, metabolomic changes during the baby’s development, and the baby’s growth. The chemical analysis showed that changes in the levels of the molecules may be responsible for the effects on birth weight. Future studies may target the important chemical mechanisms of the molecules, which may help develop early detection and intervention strategies for babies with low birth weight due to PFAS.

 

Why was this study needed?

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are called “forever chemicals” because they stay in the environment a long time. PFAS exposures have been linked to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as lower birth weights, but there is little information on why this relationship exists and how PFAS exposures affect the body. Also, African American women and children are exposed to higher levels of environmental pollutants and have a higher risk of negative birth outcomes, so studies focusing on this population are very important for reducing heath disparities.

 

Who was involved?

This study included 313 participants enrolled in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child ECHO cohort between March 2014 and May 2018.

 

What happened during the study?

Researchers collected blood samples from participants and measured the levels of PFAS and small molecules essential to a baby’s development. Using this information, the researchers calculated how the levels of the molecules changed in response to PFAS exposures and how these exposures affected the birth weight of babies.

 

What happens next?

The research team is working on additional analyses on the impact of exposures to PFAS before birth and the levels of essential small molecules in newborns. They are also planning to conduct larger analyses in order to get a more holistic view of the connection between PFAS exposures and adverse birth outcomes.

 

Where can I learn more?

For research updates, follow them on Twitter @donghai_liang, @chejung_chang, @EmoryRollins, and @EmoryHERCULES, and check out the Environmental Metabolomics Research Group’s website.

Access the full journal article, titled “Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure, maternal metabolomic perturbation, and fetal growth in African American women: A meet-in-the-middle approach” in Environment International.

 

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

 

Published November 1, 2021

 

Access the associated article.

See ECHO's PFAS research.

Read More Research Summaries about Chemical Exposures and Pregnancy

How Chemical Exposures in Pregnancy Affect Gene Changes in the Placenta

Author(s): Alison Paquette, Sheela Sathyanarayana, MD, MPH, et al.

Assessing Links between Multiple Chemical Exposures during Pregnancy and Birthweight Using Exposure Continuum Mapping

Author(s): John L. Pearce, Brian Neelon, Michael S. Bloom, Jessie P. Buckley, Cande V. Ananth, Frederica Perera, John Vena, and Kelly Hunt

Do chemicals that break down slowly in the environment affect how long it takes to become pregnant?  

Author(s): Linda Kahn, Alison Hipwell, Kim Harley, Pam Factor-Litvak, Michele Klein-Fedyshin, Christine Porucznik, Eva Siegel, Yeyi Zhu

Assessment of Chemical Exposures During Pregnancy Using Silicone Wristbands

Author(s): Brett Doherty and Megan Romano

A review of studies that look at whether exposure to common non-persistent chemicals in consumer products delays the time it takes to become pregnant

Author(s): Alison E. Hipwell, Linda G. Kahn, Pam Factor-Litvak, et al