ECHO Researchers Measure Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress in Families

Authors: Courtney K. Blackwell, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health with co-funding from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.

Why was this study needed?

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social distancing strategies may have ongoing negative effects on mental health. To measure this, ECHO researchers developed the Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress Scale (PTSS) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Acute Stress Disorder criteria. This study describes the development and validation of this new measurement tool and reports differences in pandemic-related traumatic stress in a large sample of children and adults.

What were the study results?

On average, caregivers had the highest levels of pandemic-related traumatic stress, followed by adolescents, pregnant/postpartum individuals, and children. Within these groups, the researchers found additional differences related to age and gender. Adolescents, females, and caregivers of children under 5 had higher PTSS scores on average than younger children, males, and caregivers of children 5 and older, respectively.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

The researchers found that PTSS is a reliable way to measure pandemic-related traumatic stress in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher levels of pandemic-related traumatic stress were associated with greater symptoms of distress and lower life satisfaction. Unlike previous measures that capture traumatic stress reactions to a single event, the PTSS was developed to evaluate potential traumatic stress reactions to ongoing large-scale threats without defined time limits. Researchers and doctors can use this scale to distinguish general stress, depression, and anxiety from traumatic stress, helping them to identify people with higher levels of traumatic stress who may need mental health support.

Who was involved?

This study included 17,830 children and adults from 47 ECHO Cohort study sites representing all 50 states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. Researchers split the sample into four groups including 1,656 pregnant or postpartum individuals; 11,483 adult caregivers; 1,795 adolescents aged 13 to 21; and caregivers who reported on 2,896 children aged 3 to 12.

What happened during the study?

Between April 2020 and August 2021, caregivers reported on behaviors observed in children aged 3 to 12, and adolescents and adults completed self-reported surveys on pandemic-related traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, anxiety, general stress, and life satisfaction.

What happens next?

The PTSS can be used beyond the immediate COVID-19 pandemic context. The PTSS could be adapted to evaluate reactions to other severe stressors that last a long time.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Development and Psychometric Validation of the Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress Scale for Children and Adults,” in Psychological Assessment.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Read the associated article.

Published November 3, 2023

Download this summary

ECHO Researchers Measure Pandemic-Related Traumatic Stress in Families

New ECHO Cohort Research Finds Adolescents with Disabilities May Have Been More Vulnerable to Social Disruptions During COVID-19 Pandemic

<< Back to Research Summaries

New ECHO Cohort Research Finds Adolescents with Disabilities May Have Been More Vulnerable to Social Disruptions During COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors: Phillip Sherlock, Maxwell Mansolf, Courtney Blackwell, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

Although researchers have looked at how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of children of all ages, few studies have examined the pandemic’s impact on children and teens with pre-existing mental, emotional, behavioral, and developmental (MEBD) disabilities like depression, anxiety, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Health policies that were put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 caused disruption of normal activities for children and families. Schools paused in-person learning, extracurricular activities were cancelled, and stay-at-home orders meant children spent more time quarantined with family members instead of engaging with friends and peers.

This study was needed to understand how the stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted life satisfaction for adolescents with disabilities, as adolescence is a critical period of social development. Researchers aimed to learn which groups of adolescents were most affected by the pandemic, so that mental health practitioners, pediatricians, and family physicians might be better informed of potential intervention and prevention practices that could be implemented to help particularly vulnerable adolescents through difficult times in the future.

What were the study results?

When exposed to certain stresses during the COVID-19 pandemic, adolescents with a history of depression, anxiety, ASD, or ADHD had lower life satisfaction compared to their peers. These stresses included decreased social connectedness, decreased family engagement, stress related to medical care access, pandemic-related traumatic stress, and living in a single-caregiver household.

This study also found that 80% of adolescents, regardless of pre-existing conditions, reported decreases in social connectedness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the detrimental effect of decreased social connectedness was amplified among individuals with certain pre-existing MEBD conditions, this risk factor was widespread among the majority of adolescents.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

This study found that adolescents with decreased social connectedness typically had lower life satisfaction across several groups with different life circumstances. However, decreased social connectedness was more harmful for individuals with disabilities. This study allowed researchers to identify the groups of adolescents with disabilities who are most vulnerable and may need additional support during future emergencies. Findings from this study also highlight the importance of interventions aimed specifically at increasing social connectedness, family engagement, and access to medical support for all adolescents, and especially for those with disabilities.

Who was involved?

This study included COVID-19 survey data collected from April 2020 to August 2021 from a sample of 1,084 adolescents ages 11–21 years old, and their caregivers. The sample included individuals with and without disabilities from seven ECHO observational research sites in the U.S.

What happened during the study?

In addition to using pre-existing ECHO Cohort data about adolescents and their families, researchers administered a COVID-19-specfic survey to better understand the physical, mental, and social impact of the pandemic on young people and their families. Data were analyzed using a machine-learning process.

What happens next?

Findings from this study showed evidence of potential differences between adolescents with disabilities and their peers in terms of life satisfaction. Future research is needed to design studies that focus on the vulnerable subgroups identified in this study. Additionally, future studies may look into the long-term effects of decreased social connections and other risks resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic during developmentally critical time periods.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Life Satisfaction for Adolescents with Developmental and Behavioral Disabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” in Pediatric Research.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Read the associated article.

Published October 24, 2023

Download this summary

New ECHO Cohort Research Finds Adolescents with Disabilities May Have Been More Vulnerable to Social Disruptions During COVID-19 Pandemic

Educational Background and Child Age Influenced Experiences of Caregivers During COVID 19 Pandemic

<< Back to Research Summaries

Educational Background and Child Age Influenced Experiences of Caregivers During COVID‑19 Pandemic

Authors: Kaja Z. LeWinn, Lisa Jacobson, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting public health measures presented unique challenges for families, frequently influenced by factors such as income and educational background. Yet while research has highlighted the sociodemographic factors that influenced adults’ experience, the COVID-19 pandemic generally interfered with population-based studies of children and families. However, in April 2020, the ECHO Program introduced a COVID‑19‑specific questionnaire that allowed researchers to gather information on how the pandemic and its effects on daily life were influencing the health of children. This study used ECHO data collected from April 2020 to March 2022 to examine sociodemographic differences in pandemic-related experiences.

What were the study results?

The study suggested that caregivers with less than a high school education were more likely to report challenges accessing COVID-19 testing for their children, were less likely to work remotely, and reported financial concerns and access to necessities such as food as top sources of stress. Caregivers with a master’s degree or higher, on the other hand, were more likely to name social distancing as the top source of their pandemic stress. The study also noted that caregivers with higher education had a significantly greater likelihood of having the option to work remotely. Caregivers with children between the ages of 1 and 5 reported the least support from school systems, the most difficulty finding childcare, and fewer remote learning options; were more likely to have healthcare appointments canceled due to COVID‑19 concerns, and were most concerned about how the pandemic would affect their ability to work.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

This study underscores the importance of understanding how children and caregivers from various backgrounds experienced the COVID-19 pandemic. This understanding can help uncover social inequities that could worsen conditions for some populations during future public health crises. These findings suggest that families with young children may be in particular need of more support related to childcare and work flexibility during future public health crises that involve school disruption.

Who was involved?

The study analyzed data from 14,646 ECHO children and 13,644 ECHO caregivers between April 2020 and March 2022.

What happened during the study?

Researchers measured COVID‑19 pandemic‑related experiences using three characteristics—caregiver education, child life stage, and urban or rural residence. Caregivers completed ECHO COVID‑19 surveys about their experiences during the pandemic for their children and themselves. Among children, researchers examined items related to COVID‑19 infection, access to COVID‑19 testing, changes to healthcare, and disruptions to school, preschool, or daycare. For caregivers, researchers examined remote work, childcare challenges, and their subjective ranking of pandemic‑related stressors.

What happens next?

Future research could explore the complex connections between the outcomes examined as well as the long-term impacts of COVID‑19 infection and pandemic‑related adversities for children in the ECHO Cohort over time.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Sociodemographic Differences in COVID-19 Pandemic Experiences Among Families in the United States,” in JAMA Network Open.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Read the associated article.

Published August 23, 2023

Download this summary

Educational Background and Child Age Influenced Experiences of Caregivers During COVID‑19 Pandemic

ECHO Study Links COVID-19 Stress, Slightly Earlier Births

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Links COVID-19 Stress, Slightly Earlier Births

Authors: Kim McKee, Sarah Comstock, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

Why was this study needed?

The effects of depression and stress during pregnancy and their relationship to poor birth outcomes, such as preterm birth, are well documented. This study evaluated how maternal stress during the pandemic may have contributed to newborn health outcomes.

What were the study results?

Babies born to ECHO participants who were pregnant during the pandemic had similar birth weights but were born slightly earlier compared to babies born to ECHO participants who were pregnant between 2016-2019, prior to the pandemic. The study also found levels of stress were similar for ECHO participants who were pregnant between March 2020 and May 2021 compared to those who were pregnant between 2016 and 2019. However, more participants who gave birth from March to September 2020 reported being distressed about changes to their prenatal care and delivery compared with those who delivered after September 2020.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should always consult with a qualified healthcare provider for diagnosis and for answers to your personal questions.

What was the study's impact?

While other studies have noted increased levels of depression and anxiety among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic, these trends were not observed in pregnant ECHO participants. These results suggest that many pregnant women in the United States may have already been experiencing stress before the pandemic that didn’t significantly increase following the start of the pandemic.

Who was involved?

This study included a total of 2,983 ECHO participants from 30 U.S. states and territories who delivered a baby between January 1, 2016 and May 31, 2021.

What happened during the study?

In this study, researchers evaluated medical records and maternal reports on birth weight, gestational age at delivery, and birth weight percentiles adjusted for gestational age at delivery among participants. Researchers also used data from pregnant participants across all time periods that measured depression and perceived stress. Participants who were pregnant during the pandemic reported on stress during the pandemic using a questionnaire developed during the pandemic for use with ECHO participants.

What happens next?

The study ended in May 2021 while the pandemic continued to create stressful and confusing conditions for pregnant women and their families. Similar analyses with data from additional pandemic periods could shed light on how the pandemic continues to affect pregnancy and infant health outcomes.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Perinatal Outcomes during versus Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Role of Maternal Depression and Perceived Stress: A Report from the ECHO Program,” in The American Journal of Perinatology.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Download this summary

ECHO Study Links COVID-19 Stress, Slightly Earlier Births

Women Pregnant During COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced More Stress, Depression Symptoms

<< Back to Research Summaries

Women Pregnant During COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced More Stress, Depression Symptoms

Authors: Alison E. Hipwell, Irene Tung, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

What were the study results?

This study compared ECHO participants who were pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic with participants who were pregnant before the pandemic. Participants who were pregnant during the pandemic reported more stress and symptoms of depression. Lower levels of physical activity were associated with more distress, and higher levels of emotional support were associated with less distress during pregnancy for both groups. The results also showed that pregnancies during the pandemic were slightly shorter on average but there was no impact on infant birth weight.

What was the study's impact?

This study highlights the importance of providing access to emotional support and mental health care during pregnancy and identifying ways to promote physical activity to help improve maternal health and well-being, regardless of external conditions like the pandemic.

Why was this study needed?

Previous studies on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy outcomes have been mixed. This is partly because background information about pregnant participants has been missing and partly because the effects of the pandemic are different for different populations across the country. This study involved pregnant participants from across the United States and collected information about their mental health and well-being along with data on their pregnancy outcomes. The study also focused on positive factors that can be used to improve pregnancy health and birth outcomes, such as physical activity and emotional support.

Who was involved?

This study included 501 pregnant participants who gave birth during the COVID-19 pandemic (between March 12, 2020 and May 30, 2021) and 501 pregnant participants who gave birth before the pandemic (prior to March 11, 2020). Participants were 31 years old on average and enrolled in one of 16 ECHO research sites across the United States.

What happened during the study?

Participants answered questions about their experiences with stress and depression, reported on their physical activity, and described the emotional support they received during pregnancy. The researchers also collected information on participants’ birth outcomes from medical records and maternal reports.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What happens next?

More research is needed to understand how social support and physical activity during pregnancy may protect pregnant women from stress or depression during difficult times. Future research may look for more details about the types of experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic that had the most influence on pregnancy health and well-being.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Impact of Sedentary Behavior and Emotional Support on Prenatal Psychological Distress and Birth Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” in Psychological Medicine.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published March 8, 2023

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

Women Pregnant During COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced More Stress, Depression Symptoms

ECHO Study Suggests COVID-19 Pandemic Contributed to Developmental Delays in Infants, Toddlers

<< Back to Research Summaries

ECHO Study Suggests COVID-19 Pandemic Contributed to Developmental Delays in Infants, Toddlers

Authors: Sara Nozadi, Johnnye Lewis, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

What were the study results?

In this study, up to 15% of infants and toddlers who were developmentally on track prior to the COVID-19 pandemic showed signs of developmental delays during the pandemic. Male children showed more delays than female children, and language was the most affected developmental area. Families from minority communities and those with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to experience pandemic-related hardships. However, financial and social pandemic-related hardships were not associated with the individual changes observed in children’s developmental progress.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

This study highlights the importance of early developmental screening during times of adversity, such as pandemics, in order to identify delays and connect children to supportive services. Previous studies have shown negative impacts of the pandemic on overall child development but have not looked at the effects of the pandemic on individual children’s development over time.

Why was this study needed?

Many studies have focused on the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on the development of school-aged children, evaluating the effects of the pandemic on academic performance and behavior problems. Fewer studies have examined the pandemic’s effects on the developmental progress of infants and toddlers, whose needs are different than those of school-aged children. During this study, researchers examined whether the negative developmental effects observed in school-aged children over the course of the pandemic could also be seen in infants and toddlers.

Who was involved?

The study included 684 children between the ages of 2 months and 4 years from 8 ECHO cohort research sites across the United States. Researchers included children whose parents had filled out the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), which uses parent-reported information to pinpoint a child’s developmental progress, within the 18-month period before and after March 2020. Parents of participating children were also asked about financial hardship, defined as at least one parent experiencing job loss or change, or social hardships, defined as families’ quarantining from household members or extended family and friends, during the pandemic.

What happened during the study?

Parents answered 30 questions before and during the pandemic to determine whether their child had achieved developmental milestones in language, motor, cognitive or problem solving, and socioemotional development. Researchers also used the ECHO COVID-19 survey that was developed in April 2020 to gauge pandemic-related financial and social stress on families.

What happens next?

Future research can follow the developmental patterns in these children over time to determine if COVID-19 related delays are lasting or reversible. Studies may also focus on pandemic-related stressors that could particularly effect infants and toddlers, such as family dynamics, parent-child interactions and parental stress.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Effects of COVID-19 financial and social hardships on infants’ and toddlers’ development in the ECHO program,” in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published January 5, 2023

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

ECHO Study Suggests COVID-19 Pandemic Contributed to Developmental Delays in Infants, Toddlers

Mothers Who Experience More Life Changes Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Reported More Symptoms of Traumatic Stress

<< Back to Research Summaries

Mothers Who Experience More Life Changes Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Reported More Symptoms of Traumatic Stress

Authors: Tracy Bastain, Amy Margolis, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health supported this research.

What were the study results?

The study identified two groups of mothers based on their pandemic experiences. One of these groups experienced more changes to their daily life routines, more isolation from friends and family, and more changes to their health behaviors, when compared to the other group who experienced fewer pandemic-related changes in their lives.

Mothers who reported more life changes also reported more symptoms of traumatic stress due to the pandemic. The mothers who fell into the group that experienced more changes and reported more symptoms of traumatic stress tended to be women with higher incomes and higher education. Sixty-six percent of the women in the high change group were white. The women in the high change group were more likely to report financial concerns as a cause of stress. They were also more likely to report that the pandemic affected their healthcare.

In contrast, the group that reported fewer changes tended to have lower education and lower income. The women in this group were primarily Black and Native American. Hispanic women were split evenly between the two groups.

Both groups reported similar rates of COVID-19 infection in the household and similar work changes.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

Impact

As compared to fathers, during the COVID-19 pandemic more mothers have been affected by job and income losses, taken on more childcare burdens related to remote schooling, and have made major adjustments to their daily routines. This study found that mothers who had the most changes to their work, health, and social support systems also reported the highest amounts of traumatic stress due to the pandemic. These findings suggest that the association between sociodemographic, stressful life events, and mental health should be considered in future studies examining the long-term outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Why was this study needed?

The goal of this study was to better understand the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mothers in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Who was involved?

This study included 11,473 mothers from 62 ECHO cohorts across the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

What happened during the study?

ECHO researchers investigated the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health, from April 2020 through August 2021. The researchers looked for patterns of pandemic-related changes in maternal health and health behaviors, healthcare visits, work and finances, and coping strategies. They then used these data to group the mothers by those who had more or fewer pandemic-related changes to examine whether these groups reported higher or lower symptoms of traumatic stress related to the pandemic.

What happens next?

Future studies could examine how changes over the course of the pandemic affect mothers’ stress and well-being.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “COVID-19 Pandemic Experiences and Symptoms of Pandemic-Associated Traumatic Stress Among Mothers in the US,” in JAMA Network Open.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published December 16, 2022

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

Mothers Who Experience More Life Changes Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Reported More Symptoms of Traumatic Stress

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children’s Sleep Schedules Changed, But Their Time Asleep Stayed the Same

<< Back to Research Summaries

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children's Sleep Schedules Changed, But Their Time Asleep Stayed the Same

Authors: Maristella Lucchini, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

What were the study results?

During the COVID-19 pandemic, children in the United States went to bed later, woke up later, and took longer to fall asleep, but their overall time spent asleep did not change. Interviews with caregivers revealed that they prioritized routines to maintain their children’s amount of sleep but were more flexible about bedtime. Across all time periods studied, children from racial and ethnic minority communities went to bed later, slept less, and napped more often.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

This is one of the first studies investigating changes in childhood sleep habits in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic using data collected before and during the pandemic. The researchers found significant changes in children’s sleep habits, as well as differences in children’s sleep behaviors between racial/ethnic groups. These results highlight potential areas for future research and support the need to examine and address root causes of racial/ethnic sleep disparities in childhood.

Why was this study needed?

Sleep health during childhood is important for overall health and brain development. Poor sleep can increase a child’s risk for chronic illnesses, behavioral problems, and poor memory. Factors that affect sleep health may have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic due to lockdowns and curfews, increased stress, and changes in social support. Many studies have shown that, due to systemic and structural inequities, the pandemic has affected the health behaviors of children differently based on their socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity. These differences may worsen existing gaps in children’s health.

Several studies have reported on how the pandemic has affected childhood sleep habits, but few of these studies involved children in the United States. Most previous studies have relied on self-reported or time-limited data and have focused primarily on early stages of the pandemic. The goal of this study was to investigate changes in nighttime sleep habits and frequency of daytime naps during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Who was involved?

This study included 528 children aged 4 to 12 from 14 ECHO cohorts across the United States. The caregivers of 38 participants provided additional information about how they thought their children’s sleep habits may have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What happened during the study?

The researchers compared data from before the pandemic with data collected at two different time periods during the pandemic. They used this data to examine the length of time it took children to fall asleep, time spent asleep at night during the week and on weekends, and the frequency of later bedtimes and daytime naps. They also collected sociodemographic information (child sex, age, race and ethnicity, maternal education) from self-reports and medical records.

What happens next?

ECHO researchers are currently analyzing and publishing results on changes in diet, physical activity, and screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic from the same cohort of children.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children’s sleep habits: an ECHO study,” in Pediatric Research.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published October 4, 2022

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children's Sleep Schedules Changed, But Their Time Asleep Stayed the Same

Conducting a Pediatric Randomized Clinical Trial During a Pandemic: A Shift to Virtual Procedures

<< Back to Research Summaries

Conducting a Pediatric Randomized Clinical Trial During a Pandemic: A Shift to Virtual Procedures

Authors: James Roberts, Sheva Chervinskiy, Russell McCulloh, Jessica Snowden, Paul Darden, Thao-Ly Phan, Erin Dawley, Victoria Reynolds, Crystal Lim, Lee Pyles, DeAnn Hubberd, Jaime Baldner, Lora Lawrence, Ann Davis

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health.

What was done?

The study's goal was to enroll 128 children aged 6 to 12 years old and one parent at four rural clinics over 10 weeks. However, the trial was paused after 6 weeks due to COVID-19. Over the next 12 weeks, the trial resumed using virtual visits where investigators completed enrollment, obtained informed consent, and assessed height and weight of children. Because all study activity was virtual, digital scales and height measurement equipment were shipped to participants' homes, and a second virtual visit was conducted to monitor these measurements. Some participants who did not have internet and needed support for virtual visits received internet-enabled tablets.

What was found?

When the trial was paused, 42 patients had been enrolled. When the trial resumed virtually, 28 of the 42 continued in the trial, and an additional 89 new participants were enrolled for a total of 117 children. Flexibility was key to solving problems and continuing to enroll and retain participants.

The investigators discovered the challenges and benefits of conducting a virtual trial of this nature. Some challenges to conducting a virtual trial include unreliable equipment delivery, unreturned study equipment, slow Internet speeds and/or poor Internet access in rural areas, and the added costs of buying and shipping equipment and mailing other study materials. However, the benefits of a virtual trial included the ability to conduct study visits at other times of the day, including evenings and weekends. For example, research staff could conduct study visits at any time of the day, and study-related travel was limited.

What do the results mean?

The lessons learned from this trial can be applied by any study team recruiting participants from rural areas for a clinical trial. These include:

Virtual visits and procedures enable successful recruitment and retention of participants from rural areas.
Research teams must be agile, flexible, and willing to adapt study procedures to meet clinic resources and unanticipated situations.
While there are considerable additional expenses for buying and shipping study equipment to participants, these costs may be offset by decreased travel to and from rural areas by study staff.

Why was this study conducted?

In the United States, children living in rural areas have higher rates of being overweight. Unfortunately, children from rural areas seldom participate in clinical research trials. A clinical research trial on changing lifestyle behaviors in rural children who were overweight started in early 2020 but, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, had to switch to virtual procedures instead of in-person visits. Sharing the solutions to problems faced and the lessons learned in completing this trial may help other research teams recruit participants living in rural areas.

Appreciation:

The authors appreciate the children, families, and clinics whose participation made the research possible.

You can read the full publication here: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.453

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Download this summary

Conducting a Pediatric Randomized Clinical Trial During a Pandemic: A Shift to Virtual Procedures

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children’s Screen Time Increased

<< Back to Research Summaries

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children's Screen Time Increased

Authors: Traci Bekelman, et al.

Who sponsored this study?

This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health.

What were the study results?

The study found that overall children’s screen time increased significantly during the pandemic with Hispanic children and non-Hispanic Black children having the most noticeable increase in screen time. The study didn’t find any significant increase in the amounts of sugary drinks and unhealthy snack foods children consumed during the pandemic, but it did find a more noticeable increase among Hispanic children and older children. The amount of time children spent asleep increased but only among children whose sleep time was below the recommended range before the pandemic.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting your healthcare professional.

What was the study's impact?

This study shows how the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic affected children’s daily lives. The results of this study suggest that the pandemic may have worsened sociodemographic disparities for some child health behaviors, particularly in relation to the amount of time children spent looking at screens. This research suggests that families may need more support to re-establish healthy routines and reduce the negative effects of the pandemic on their children’s health behaviors.

Why was this study needed?

For many children, public health measures to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted their daily routines, and prevented them from using community resources, such as parks and organized sports. During the first few months of the pandemic, there were changes in children’s health behaviors—such as diet, screen time, physical activity, and sleep habits. However, there are limited data on what happened to children’s health behaviors after the earliest, most restrictive lockdown period. This is an important topic because children’s health behaviors have been linked to their overall mental and physical health, academic achievement, and quality of life.

Who was involved?

The study included 347 children between the ages of 4 to 12 years and their caregivers recruited from ECHO cohorts in California, Colorado, North Dakota, and New Hampshire. Of those participants, 47% percent were female, and 62% were non-Hispanic White.

What happened during the study?

ECHO researchers collected data on children’s diet, physical activity, screen time, and sleep habits before and during the pandemic. The researchers also surveyed caregivers on how they thought their children’s health behaviors had changed during the pandemic. This study also explored how sociodemographic factors affected children’s health behaviors to identify children who are more likely to experience less recommended changes in behaviors.

What happens next?

This research may help us identify ways to support families with children in future public health emergencies. The ECHO Program is currently working to study changes in other related health behaviors. This includes changes in how well children follow national dietary guidelines, use of social media, and bedtimes/wake-up times.

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Health Behavior Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Analysis among Children,” in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Published August 19, 2022

Access the associated article.

Download this summary

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Children's Screen Time Increased