Phthalate Replacement Chemical Associated with Lower Birth Weight

<< Back to Research Summaries

Phthalate Replacement Chemical Associated with Lower Birth Weight

Author(s): Leonardo Trasande, et al.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Higher pregnancy levels of some markers for di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH) exposure were linked to slightly smaller babies at birth. DINCH is a chemical used to soften plastics and replace some phthalates.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director,
National Institutes of Health supported this research.

 

Why was this study needed?

Phthalates are widely used chemicals found in many everyday items such as food packaging, flooring, building materials, medicine coatings, medical supplies, cosmetics, and personal care products. These chemicals have been linked to adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes. As manufacturers replace phthalates with alternatives presumed to be safer such as di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH), ECHO researchers want to understand whether these newer chemicals may also affect maternal and child health.

 

What were the study results?

Researchers found that higher levels of chemical markers related to DINCH exposure in urine during pregnancy were associated with lower birth weight and a greater likelihood that infants would be born small for gestational age. Every tenfold increase in exposure to DINCH resulted in a 27-gram reduction in newborn birth weight. These associations differed by infant sex: associations with babies’ physical length were stronger among boys while associations with being small-for-gestational-age were stronger among girls. Exposure during the third trimester appeared more strongly associated with reduced birth weight for gestational age than exposure earlier in pregnancy.

The researchers also found that measurable levels of these DINCH markers were common among pregnant participants, suggesting widespread exposure in this population.

 

What was the study's impact?

These findings suggest that prenatal exposure to this phthalate alternative may be associated with differences in fetal growth. However, the study was observational and cannot determine whether DINCH directly caused these outcomes. Additional research could help researchers understand how DINCH may affect pregnancy and fetal development and evaluate the safety of other phthalate replacements.

 

Who was involved?

Researchers analyzed data from 6,617 pregnancies at 22 ECHO Cohort study sites.

 

What happened during the study?

Researchers measured three DINCH breakdown products in urine from pregnant women. They averaged measurements across pregnancy and within trimesters when available. They compared these levels with the babies weight and length at birth, the duration of pregnancy, and size for gestational age, accounting for maternal age, education, prior births, race and ethnicity, child sex, and study site.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new
information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting
your healthcare professional.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Prenatal exposure to di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate and adverse birth outcomes in the USA: a prospective analysis of births in a large American birth cohort,” in Environment International.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views
of the National Institutes of Health.

Published November 3, 2026

Read the related news release(opens in new tab).

Higher prenatal fluoride exposure in public drinking water linked to lower fluid cognition scores in children

<< Back to Research Summaries

Higher prenatal fluoride exposure in public drinking water linked to lower fluid cognition scores in children

Author(s): Katrina R. Simon, Amy E. Margolis, Anne E. Nigra, et al.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Children whose mothers were potentially exposed to higher fluoride levels in public drinking water during pregnancy tended to score lower on tests of problem-solving, memory, attention, and adapting to new information.
  • The association was strongest when fluoride levels in neighborhood drinking water were close to or above the current U.S. recommended levels.

Who sponsored this study?

The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director,
National Institutes of Health supported this research.

 

Why was this study needed?

Fluoride is found naturally in some water sources and is also added to many public drinking water systems to help prevent cavities. Current United States guidance for fluoridated water is designed to support dental health and reduce the risk of tooth or bone problems, but more evidence is needed to fully understand the possible effects of fluoridated water on children’s brain development. In a recent review, the National Toxicology Program found moderate evidence that children exposed to fluoride levels above 1.5 milligrams in each liter of drinking water may have lower IQ scores. The report also noted that there is limited research on lower fluoride levels, especially in U.S. populations.

ECHO researchers wanted to know whether fluoride levels in public drinking water during pregnancy were related to children’s cognition, or thinking and learning skills, later in childhood.

 

What were the study results?

Children whose mothers were potentially exposed to higher fluoride levels in public drinking water during pregnancy tended to score lower on tests of fluid cognition. Fluid cognition includes skills such as problem-solving, memory, attention, and adapting to new information.

The association was strongest at fluoride levels near or above the current U.S. Public Health Service recommended level for fluoridated water. In one analysis, lower fluid cognition scores were seen after about 675 micrograms per liter, which is close to the current recommended level of 700 micrograms per liter. The current regulatory level set by EPA is higher at 4,000 micrograms per liter. Above 675 micrograms per liter, each 500 micrograms per liter increase in fluoride was associated with an average 3.36-point lower score on the standardized fluid cognition scale.

The results were clearer for fluid cognition than for crystallized cognition, which includes learned knowledge such as vocabulary. The study did not find the same consistent pattern between higher fluoride levels and lower crystallized cognition scores across all children.

Children younger than 7 had larger differences in cognition scores linked to higher prenatal fluoride exposure, though more research is needed to understand why.

 

What was the study's impact?

This study adds to a large body of work that looks at how early exposure to environmental contaminants may be associated the development of the thinking and learning processes that are important for children’s developmental outcomes. Future research could focus on when children may be most sensitive to fluoride exposure and examine both potential developmental risks and dental health benefits to better understand relationships between fluoride exposure and child health. Because this was an observational study, the results show an association and do not prove that fluoride caused lower cognition scores.

 

Who was involved?

The study included 2,514 children from 17 ECHO Cohort Study Sites across 23 U.S. states. Children were born between 2006 and 2019 and completed cognition testing between ages 3 and 17.

 

What happened during the study?

Researchers estimated each child’s prenatal fluoride exposure by linking public water fluoride data to the mother’s residential address during pregnancy. They used monthly address information to estimate the average fluoride level in public drinking water during pregnancy. Children later completed NIH Toolbox cognition tests, which measured fluid cognition, crystallized cognition, and total cognition. Researchers then examined whether higher prenatal fluoride levels were related to differences in cognition scores, while accounting for factors such as child sex, birthing parent age and education, prenatal tobacco use, season of conception, and neighborhood characteristics.

The study focused on fluoride levels in public drinking water and did not measure total fluoride exposure from other sources such as toothpaste, tea, foods, supplements, bottled water, or private wells.

Footnote: Results reported here are for a single study. Other or future studies may provide new
information or different results. You should not make changes to your health without first consulting
your healthcare professional.

 

Where can I learn more?

Access the full journal article, titled “Prenatal exposure to fluoride in public water and child cognition in the US ECHO Cohort, 2006-2019,” in American Journal of Epidemiology.

The content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views
of the National Institutes of Health.

Published August 17, 2026

Read the related news release.

Higher Fluoride Levels in Public Drinking Water During Pregnancy May Be Linked to Differences in Children’s Cognition Scores, NIH-Funded Study Finds

Pregnant woman having a glass of water

Associations appeared when fluoride levels in neighborhood drinking water were close to or above current U.S. recommended levels.

Pregnant mothers who lived in neighborhoods where public drinking water fluoride levels were near or above the current U.S. recommended levels, tended to have children who scored lower on tests of fluid reasoning as fluoride levels increased, according to a new study supported by the National Institutes of Health’s Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program.

Fluoride occurs naturally in some water sources and is commonly added to public water systems to help prevent cavities. The paper’s authors note that a recent National Toxicology Program review examined evidence linking fluoride exposure levels above 1,500 micrograms per liter in drinking water with lower IQ scores in children. However, most U.S. public water systems have lower fluoride levels, and questions remain about associations at lower levels typically found in the United States.

ECHO researchers looked at whether fluoride levels in public drinking water during pregnancy were related to cognitive scores assessed during childhood.

"This study addresses an important gap by evaluating prenatal water fluoride and child cognition in a large U.S. sample," said lead author Katrina Simon, PhD, of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. "Findings from this work offer evidence that can inform ongoing guidance aimed at supporting children's development."

Researchers reported that children whose mothers had higher estimated fluoride levels in public drinking water during pregnancy tended to score lower on tests of fluid cognition that include problem-solving, memory, attention, and the ability to adapt to new information. Higher water fluoride levels were only linked to lower fluid cognition scores when water fluoride levels were near and above 675 micrograms per liter, which is close to the current U.S. Public Health Service recommended level of 700 micrograms, or 0.7 milligrams, per liter for fluoridated water. The current regulatory level set by EPA is higher at 4,000 micrograms per liter. Above 675 micrograms per liter, each 500 micrograms per liter increase in fluoride was associated with an average 3.36-point lower score on the standardized fluid cognition scale.

Researchers also found that the relationship between prenatal fluoride levels and cognition was specific to fluid cognition. Importantly, the study did not identify a link between fluoride and crystallized cognition, which includes learned knowledge such as vocabulary, across all ages.

In addition, the associations appeared stronger when cognition was assessed at a younger age. Children younger than 7 years of age showed larger differences in cognition scores associated with higher prenatal fluoride exposure compared to older children. Additional research is needed to better understand these age-related findings.

The study included 2,514 children born between 2006 and 2019 who completed cognitive testing between ages 3 and 17.

To estimate prenatal water fluoride exposure, researchers linked publicly available drinking water fluoride measurements to residential address information collected during pregnancy from ECHO participants. The study focused specifically on fluoride levels in public drinking water systems and did not measure total fluoride exposure from all possible sources, such as toothpaste, tea, foods, supplements, bottled water, or private wells.

Researchers then compared these estimates with children's performance on NIH Toolbox cognition assessments, while accounting for factors such as parental education, parental age, prenatal tobacco exposure, child sex, season of conception, and neighborhood characteristics.

“Because our study used fluoride measurements from public water systems that are collected as part of routine drinking water monitoring, the findings may help inform future evaluations of public drinking water guidelines,” said co-senior author Anne Nigra, PhD, also of Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health.

Community water fluoridation has long been used as a public health measure intended to reduce tooth decay. The current study does not evaluate the overall benefits and risks of community water fluoridation

“This study adds to a large body of work that looks at how early exposure to environmental contaminants may be associated with the development of the thinking and learning processes that are important for children’s developmental outcomes,” said co-senior author Amy Margolis, PhD, of The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and College of Medicine. “Continuing to study fluoride and other exposures will be integral in best supporting children’s environmental health and well-being.”

The researchers emphasize that this was an observational study. The findings demonstrate an association between prenatal fluoride exposure and children's cognition, but they do not prove that fluoride caused differences in cognitive performance.

The authors noted that future research could focus on when children may be most sensitive to fluoride exposure and examine both potential developmental risks and dental health benefits to better understand relationships between fluoride exposure and child health.

This collaborative research was published in the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Simon KR, Bloomquist TR, Rajeev T, Hernandez A, Kulali S, Burjak M, Kress AM, Palmore M, Akbaryan A, Sanchez TR, Ornelas Van Horne Y, Shin HM, Goin DE, Tamayo-Ortiz M, Patel GH, Shuffrey LC, Ghassabian A, Karagas MR, Leventhal L, Fry RC, Miller RL, Herbstman J, Morales S, Margolis AE, Nigra AE. Prenatal exposure to fluoride in public water and child cognition in the US ECHO Cohort, 2006-2019. 2026. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag186

About ECHO
The ECHO Cohort Consortium is a research program supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the mission to enhance the health of children for generations to come. ECHO Cohort investigators study the effects of a broad range of early environmental influences on child health and development. For more information, visit echochildren.org.

Media Contacts

For information or to request an interview, contact the ECHO Program Coordinating Center  echocc@dm.duke.edu.

If you are not a member of the media, but have a general inquiry, please contact  NIHKidsandEnvironment@od.nih.gov.

Connect With Us

echo connector

Check out the recent issues of our bi-monthly newsletter, the ECHO Connector, for program news and the latest research findings.

To receive the ECHO Connector through email, subscribe here.

Follow the ECHO Program on LinkedIn and X for the latest updates.