<< Back to Research Summaries
Study Summary: Lay Summary for Participant Families
The BREATHE Study: Bronchiolitis Recovery and Use of HEPA Filters
Author(s): The BREATHE Study Team
Why was this study conducted?
Bronchiolitis is an infection that affects the airways of a child. Babies with bronchiolitis may need hospital treatment. These babies may still have breathing problems, such as coughing and wheezing, after they go home.
Many things can affect a person’s ability to breathe. One of those things is the level of very small particles in the air. These particles are called PM2.5, which are particulate matter that is less than 2.5 micrometers across. That size is smaller than the size of most pollen and mold. The level of these very small particles in the air in someone’s home can be lowered by special air filters called high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters.
The BREATHE study was done to find out if HEPA filters used in a baby’s house can help them breathe better than if no filter is used in their house. Specifically, the study looked at how many days infants, who previously had bronchiolitis, had specific breathing problems such as coughing, wheezing, or other breathing problems.
What was done?
Babies chosen for this study were less than 12 months old and had been hospitalized for bronchiolitis for the first time. Babies were selected from 17 hospitals, each in a different state. A total of 228 families were given either 2 HEPA units or 2 control units (identical units but with filters removed). One unit was to be used in the baby’s sleep space and the other unit in a common room of the home. Families did not know which types of units they were given. Air quality monitors measured the level of very small particles (PM2.5) in their homes. Families reported the number of days that their babies had breathing troubles. These reports were done weekly for 6 months. At the end of the study, families learned whether they had been using HEPA units or control units. All families were then given new HEPA filters. They also received individual reports about the PM2.5 levels in their home.
What was found?
The number of days babies had breathing problems were counted. The number of problem days for the babies living in homes with HEPA filters were compared to the number of problem days for the babies living in homes that had control units. Generally, babies in homes with working HEPA units had fewer breathing problems than babies in homes with the control units. Babies in homes with HEPA units had an average of 5 fewer days with breathing problems than did babies in homes with the control units. However, because the difference between the 2 groups is quite small, it is not clear if the breathing improvement was related to HEPA filter use or due to chance. This does not mean that the HEPA filters were not useful. It only means that it could not be proven with this study.
Compared to those with control units, babies who had HEPA filter units in their home had a 9% lower chance of unscheduled healthcare visits, such as hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and doctor’s office visits for breathing problems, but the difference between the 2 groups is small and may be due to chance. Babies who had HEPA filter units running most of the time during the study had a 25% lower chance of unscheduled doctor’s office visits for breathing problems.
On average, homes with working HEPA units had average common room PM2.5 equal to 11 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). On average, levels were higher in the common room of homes with control units (15 μg/m3). The difference was even bigger in the infant’s sleep space. On average, homes with HEPA units had sleep space PM2.5 equal to 11 μg/m3. On average, homes with control units had sleep space PM2.5 equal to 21 μg/m3.
What do the results mean?
Filtering air with a HEPA unit may help infants who have been in the hospital for bronchiolitis. Infants in houses with HEPA units may have fewer days of breathing trouble than infants in houses without HEPA units. However, we would need to do a larger study to know for sure.
Who sponsored the study?
This research was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health.
Appreciation
The authors appreciate the children and families whose participation made the research possible.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Lay Summary for the BREATHE Study (for participant distribution)
cIRB # 274137 V-01 (27-October-2025)
The BREATHE (Bronchiolitis Recovery and the Use of HEPA Filters) study successfully reached its recruitment goal ahead of schedule and has maintained high participant retention with a 94.5% survey completion rate.