BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ECHO - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:ECHO
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://echochildren.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ECHO
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20180311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20181104T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20190310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20191103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20200308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20201101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190612T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190612T140000
DTSTAMP:20260412T121314
CREATED:20190517T163247Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220602T182752Z
UID:1373-1560344400-1560348000@echochildren.org
SUMMARY:Singleton/Semmens: Working with Rural Communities to Improve Household Air Quality and Health: Strategies to Guide Environmental Interventions in the ECHO IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network
DESCRIPTION:Working with Rural Communities to Improve Household Air Quality and Health: Strategies to Guide Environmental Interventions in the ECHO IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network\n\n\n\n\nSpeakers: \nRos Singleton\, MD\, MPH; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium\, Anchorage  \nSpeaker Bio: Rosalyn Singleton graduated from Northwestern University Medical School\, Chicago and completed a Pediatric residency and MPH. She initially worked as a pediatrician in a Navajo hospital. Since 1988 she has worked as a pediatrician\, immunization consultant and researcher for Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium\, and guest researcher at Arctic Investigations Program – CDC. Ros has worked with Alaska Native people on clinical studies related to vaccine preventable infections\, respiratory infections\, vitamin D deficiency\, indoor air quality and bronchiectasis. \n  \nErin Semmens\, PhD\, MPH; University of Montana \nSpeaker Bio: Erin Semmens graduated with a degree in Biology and Political Science from Duke University and received an MPH in Environmental and Occupational Health and a PhD in Epidemiology from the University of Washington. She is an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology in the School of Public and Community Health Sciences at the University of Montana. Erin’s research investigates the effects of environmental and occupational factors– and more recently their interaction with social influences– on long-term health. Specifically\, she focuses on the health impacts of air pollution from multiple sources including wildfires\, wood smoke\, and traffic. \nOutcome Areas: Airways \nDate: Wednesday\, June 12 from 1 to 2pm \nSlides\n \n  \nDiscussion: \nQ: I would like to know the hypotheses that link those special populations\, including Alaskan Natives\, to a prevalence of bronchiectasis? \nRos Singleton: It is clear in collaborations with Australia and New Zealand and Canada and other researchers on bronchiectasis that this orphan disease is prevalent in these populations because of environmental and social factors. We did a three country analysis and discovered that household crowding was one of the most prevalent common factors. In Alaska lack of running water\, and in Australia access to basic household features like a working refrigerator and a working sink\, are the factors that are associated with both pneumonia and childhood pneumonia\, which is the driver of bronchiectasis. Bronchiectasis was common in many other populations around the world until vaccines and improvements in running water and basic public health measures have really reduced that risk around the world. But it is still prevalent in much of the developing world and low income countries\, although rarely identified because CT scans are not available. We have identified very high rates in many different indigenous populations. \nQ: Indoor PM2.5 did not decrease after intervention\, was it possible that PM2.5 from outdoors and neighboring houses played a role and that is why you do not see the decreased PM2.5?          \nRos Singleton: I don’t think that is a major factor based on the feedback that we received from the environmental health specialist. It is possible that in a time when there is a lot of wood burning that you could have ambient 2.5 that comes in and so that could be a factor. Many of these homes are on a very windy tundra so that ambient 2.5 level is not very high in general\, but we don’t have the data to prove that so that is one possibility.  I think one other major thing that we identified was just the challenges for accessing dry wood.  You have to find dry wood and in many areas there is no wood available and so people use driftwood and sometimes unfortunately trash.  My colleagues have done a lot of education around the best practices in wood burning\, and that’s why I’m excited about this new potential project in incorporating indigenous knowledge and really coming together to determine what are the best things to burn and how to burn so that it is most efficient and has the lowest PM2.5. \nQ: How prevalent is secondary cigarette exposures in the studies described today? Has smoking cessation education been combined with indoor air quality interventions discussed today? \nErin Semmens: In the ARTIS study we excluded homes where there was an active smoker in the home\, and in our ongoing study we did not make that exclusion because we thought that would exclude too many families. We don’t include smoking cessation as part of the education. We do nicotine wipes in the home as an indicator of whether there is smoking inside the home. I can say from looking at Montana birth certificate data that about 15% of women report smoking during pregnancy which is likely an underestimate\, but still fairly high. \nRos Singleton: In Alaska\, smoking rates are very high among Alaskan native people. Over 40% of adults smoke\, as compared to about 20% in other populations. In Navajo smoking is actually very rare.  In our study we did do tobacco cessation education and there are major tobacco cessation projects underway in Alaskan Native communities in collaboration with Mayo Clinic\, and specifically with pregnant women because the rate of tobacco use including both smoking and also chew is extremely prevalent and smoking cessation is challenging.  However\, the homes in this study\, as well as homes of families that have children hospitalized\, have told us for many years that they do not smoke in the home.  I believe that household education has really hit on fertile ground and people do understand the message about not smoking indoors. But smoking itself is very prevalent. \nQ: In our region (South Dakota)\, many of our families are pretty mobile between seasons. Is this a common occurrence in your region?  If so\, how did you handle this in the analysis? \nRos Singleton: In our smaller study\, we did have one family withdraw because of moving\, but in general we were able to work with families that were there for the year.  Moving is very common and that was a challenge. One family was actually living in a Conex (shipping container) at the initial part of the study and then had other housing. \nErin Semmens: Moving has been a challenge in our study\, so when we provide potential participants with information about the study\, we ask if they plan to be in the same home over the next two years.  So to be in the study they have to plan to be stable with respect to their residence\, but that isn’t always the case. That is the primary reason participants drop out of the study is because they move and when we are utilizing interventions that are aimed at improving indoor air quality it is very difficult when a person moves to a different home\, even if it is another home with a wood stove to compare that.  Unfortunately that has resulted in lost to follow-up or participants withdrawing from the study due to moving.  A somewhat related point is when children spend part of their time during the week with one parent and part of the time with another parent. In those cases the child can be in the study\, but we just do all of our sampling at the one residence. \nQ: Did the stove change-out help decrease particulate matter? \nRos Singleton: In our first study\, even with education we did not show a decrease in PM2.5.  We did show a decrease in volatile organic compounds and we actually added volatile organic compounds late\, but we found that it is a significant contributor to some aspects of indoor air pollution. In our region houses are small and villages often do not have a workshop available\, and so the home is often used as a workshop and it is not unusual to have a father that is working on a snow machine or snow mobile inside the house.  Also because of the cold temperatures\, fuel is often stored in the house and people try to store it in the artic entry way but that is another potential source of volatile organic compounds.  So we have some unusual sources of volatile organic compounds and we did some education around that. \nErin Semmens: In the Libby change-out there was a decrease in ambient PM2.5\, which is a huge achievement\, and it was such a large scale change-out. 1200 wood stoves and the population of Libby is under 3000 people\, so that was a very large scale change-out in that community. But within the homes\, indoor air quality reductions varied from home to home and the reason we hypothesized that there weren’t universal reductions is just having the new cleaner burning wood stove is not sufficient and that there are all these other best burning practices and education around how to use the wood stove that are needed as well. Another consideration is that people with new wood stoves might end up using their new stoves more. \nRos Singleton: In a pre-study home visit\, the healthy home specialist said that the house was so smoky you could hardly see across the room. Obviously if you have a wood stove that is that bad and you have an alternative like a Toyo stove you are going to use the Toyo stove\, but then if you get a great new wood stove that is much more efficient than you will probably revert to using the wood stove. That is one of our hypotheses\, that no matter what you do to a wood stove it still has more PM2.5 than not using a wood stove. So if the use of the wood stove increase\, then your PM2.5 may increase just because of that. \nQ: I’m curious about your comments about best burn practices. What are people burning\, what were they burning and talk more about best burn practices? \nRos Singleton: What you burn is so critical and like I mentioned a lot of the houses in Alaska are in non-treed areas. People burn driftwood and you have to leave driftwood for a long time for it to become dried\, and by default people often use wet wood and burn wood that is wet. The wetter it is then the more inefficiently it burns and you have higher PM2.5 gas and other things. What you burn is critical.  If you burn trash you can imagine what is in newspaper print and other things. There are all kinds of volatile compounds that are in trash and in other paper products that may have plastic also.  Sometimes families revert to burning trash because that is what they have available. There has been many efforts to try to improve this. One effort is education on stacking and drying wood\, and the emphasis on using only wood. There are also some very innovative projects that provide very efficient pellets. We’ve received feedback from some of those\, but unfortunately it is pretty expensive to have them shipped up to Alaska so we haven’t done that intervention yet. \nErin Semmens: Having dry wood is not always available even if you live in a place like Montana that has a lot of trees and a lot of wood available\, you may not have dry wood available. One of the main factors we saw in our pre-intervention year in the ARTIS study was that letting your wood dry out for a year or more was associated with lower PM2.5 concentrations\, so it is a really important feature of best burning practices. In one community in a different study taking place in Idaho that tries to address that by having a community-level intervention with a community wood yard where the wood is stored properly and in season for the recommended length of time and then distributed to elders living in the community to provide them with access to dry wood. That is one way to try and address that challenge. \nQ: I wanted to know more details about the air filtration device used in their study. Erin says it was a 3M electrostatic precipitator but I was interested in knowing more details about this device such as model and how they were maintained in the study. The info would help me understand why they did not observe reductions in PM2.5. \nErin Semmens: We used a large 3M filtrate with an electrostatic filter. We recommended that homes run the filter continuously on the highest setting\, and we saw substantial reductions (nearly 70% greater than those observed in the placebo arm) from the pre- to post-intervention winter. We replaced the filter approximately once per month. It was the wood stove change-out arm\, in which we did not see significant reductions in PM2.5 from the pre- to post-intervention winter. \nQ: Have insulation in the homes had been investigated? \nRos Singleton: For Alaska studies – In general\, the houses are insulated and tend to be tight homes for heating efficiency which can exacerbate indoor air pollution.  For the most part\, homes for our study had already had insulation evaluated through weatherization programs. \nErin Semmens: That is a great question and reminds me that we did blower door tests in the ARTIS study to evaluate airtightness. I recall we had a wide range of values but I am not sure if or to what degree home tightness varied between treatment arms. Theoretically\, it should have balanced out\, but I would need to look back to see if it actually did.
URL:https://echochildren.org/event/working-with-rural-communities-to-improve-household-air-quality-and-health-strategies-to-guide-environmental-interventions-in-the-echo-idea-states-pediatric-clinical-trials-network/
LOCATION:WebEx
CATEGORIES:airways,environmental
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190508T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190508T140000
DTSTAMP:20260412T121314
CREATED:20190422T153928Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220602T183109Z
UID:1314-1557320400-1557324000@echochildren.org
SUMMARY:Catherine Monk: Pregnant Women’s Mental Health and Its Influence on the Next Generation: Implications for ECHO Science
DESCRIPTION:Pregnant Women’s Mental Health and Its Influence on the Next Generation: Implications for ECHO Science\n\n\n\n\n\nSpeaker: \nCatherine Monk\, PhD \nColumbia University Medical Center \n  \n  \n  \nSpeaker Bio: Dr. Catherine Monk holds dual appointments as a Professor of Medical Psychology in the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology\, and Psychiatry\, and is Director of Research at the Women’s Program at Columbia University Irving Medical Center\, and Research Scientist VI at the New York State Psychiatric Institute. Originally trained as a clinical psychologist treating children and adults in a program that emphasized the developmental origins of psychopathology\, Dr. Monk’s research brings together the fields of perinatal psychiatry\, developmental psychobiology\, and neuroscience to focus on the earliest influences on children’s developmental trajectories — those that happen in utero and how to intervene early to help pregnant women and prevent risk for mental health disorders in the future children. \nOutcome Areas: Pre-\, peri\, and postnatal \nDate: Wednesday\, May 8\, 1 to 2pm \nSlides\n\nDiscussion:  \nQ: How do conceptualize stress?  What are the challenges in measuring stress? \nA: Stress is so used that it can lose precise meaning\, but it is about the person-context experience and about perception.  Stress can be measured by physical manifestations (allostatic load) or mental (subjective experience). The challenge in measuring is the difficulty in reliably linking high stress to high cortisol. \n  \nQ: One of the implications of the work was social support and its impact on outcomes.  What would it look like to do a study of this as part of ECHO? \nA: Social support has often been a co-variant or a moderator in past studies\, but it actually accounts for large differences between groups\, so it’s important to focus on in the future. ECHO could mine the data to create a hypothesis about the role of social support in creating positive outcomes. Loneliness is a factor that has been studied minimally\, but would be fascinating to look at more closely\, especially as it is differentiated from stress (women can be depressed or stress\, but have social support). \n  \nQ: A type of research that you could look at that controls just for social support is the studies done on women having a doula at their birth. Has this been researched? \nA: There is some data out there about the positive effect of doulas\, but it’s not rigorous\, so we could certainly bring in that perspective. Also\, depending on where a woman gives birth\, doulas may or may not be as welcomed and included in the process. \n  \nQ: In what ways would you study contributions of fathers in social support that might impact child outcomes? \nA: “Belonging” is fairly general at this point\, and not really distinguished as belonging with family\, friends\, or baby’s father\, but we want to learn more about fathers/partners\, and their roles in social support. \n  \nQ: Is there any data on pre-pregnancy stress and pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes? \nA: This is a main question of local cohort’s ECHO research. \n  \nQ: I’m wondering about the populations being investigated: low income\, moderate income\, and/or special populations\, i.e.\, mothers and children in homeless shelters. \nA: The part of New York (Washington Heights) where this cohort is includes a diverse group of women\, with a large representation from Latina and low-income women.  This includes women in homeless shelters. \n  \nQ: Is there any data comparing maternal non-treated depression vs. treated depression (use of medication) on health outcomes for the child? \nA: Treating women’s psychiatric issues during pregnancy was not enough; parenting issues and risk factors that contributed to these issues were not impacted by the direct treatment of depression\, and had to be addressed separately. \n  \nQ: In addition to fathers\, teams should consider asking pregnant women about specific support from mother or other family/family-like individual. Particularly in minority communities and those of low-income\, if biological fathers are not maintaining partnership with mothers\, these individuals can play a critical role (our Memphis focus groups pointed this out to us too late for us to assess this). Our questionnaires don’t typically ask about this\, and instead ask about partners. \nA: That’s a great point\, and I agree this needs to be broadened.
URL:https://echochildren.org/event/pregnant-womens-mental-health-and-its-influence-on-the-next-generation-implications-for-echo-science/
LOCATION:WebEx
CATEGORIES:outcomes,pregnancy
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20190410T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20190410T140000
DTSTAMP:20260412T121314
CREATED:20190320T151829Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220602T183543Z
UID:1268-1554901200-1554904800@echochildren.org
SUMMARY:Roz Wright: Advancing Discovery in ECHO:  Creating a Transdisciplinary Learning Culture Through Use of Life Course Models
DESCRIPTION:Advancing Discovery in ECHO: Creating a Transdisciplinary Learning Culture Through Use of Life Course Models\n\n\n\n\n\nSpeaker: \nRosalind (Roz) Wright\, MD\, MPH \nIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai\, Department of Pediatrics \n  \n  \n  \nAbout the Speaker: Rosalind J Wright MD\, MPH\, is the Horace W. Goldsmith Professor of Life Course Health Research in the Departments of Pediatrics and Environmental Medicine & Public Health at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) in New York.  She is also Dean of Translational Biomedical Sciences for the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS)\, a clinician scientist and Program Director and Principal Investigator of Conduits\, the Institute for Translational Sciences for the Mount Sinai Health System (the NCATs-funded CTSA). \nShe is an internationally recognized clinician scientist and life course epidemiologist with transdisciplinary training in molecular biology\, environmental health\, social determinants\, and stress mechanisms. Her background includes transdisciplinary training and expertise in environmental exposure assessment as well as genetics\, epigenetics\, and psychosocial stress measurement applied to environmental health studies across the life course. \nOutcome Areas: Neurodevelopment; Pre-\, peri\, and postnatal; Airways \nDate: Wednesday\, April 10\, 1 to 2pm \nPresentation Overview: \nLessons learned from developing a transdisciplinary team science and making discoveries at the intersections of various research disciplines outside of any one individual field. \nSlides\n 
URL:https://echochildren.org/event/advancing-discovery-in-echo-creating-a-transdisciplinary-learning-culture-through-use-of-life-course-models/
LOCATION:WebEx
CATEGORIES:pregnancy,theoretical
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR